[Users] BYE method accompanied by error
Klaus Darilion
klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at
Tue Oct 11 18:39:29 CEST 2005
looks like a dialog matching problem. for further inspection complete
SIP dums would be necessary:
ngrep port 5060
klaus
Brandon Price wrote:
> I find that I am having the same error, although with me it only
> happens when the sip client is natted and the bye comes from the pstn
> end. Sample tethereal capture below. I can only assume this has
> something to do with the nat module which I am currently not using yet
> but plan to try again to implement today.
>
> 48.022862 216.120.255.29 -> 8.11.1.7 SIP/SDP Request: INVITE sip:
> 15187278584 at ser1.manhattan.vtnoc.net, with session description
> 48.026850 8.11.1.7 -> 216.120.255.29 SIP Status: 100 trying -- your
> call is important to us
> 48.027059 8.11.1.7 -> oursippproxy.net SIP/SDP Request: INVITE
> sip:+15187278584 at oursippproxy.net, with session description
> 48.096933 oursippproxy.net -> 8.11.1.7 SIP Status: 100 Trying
> 49.299563 oursippproxy.net -> 8.11.1.7 SIP/SDP Status: 183 Session
> Progress, with session description
> 49.300461 8.11.1.7 -> 216.120.255.29 SIP/SDP Status: 183 Session
> Progress, with session description
> 56.407921 oursippproxy.net -> 8.11.1.7 SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK,
> with session description
> 56.409252 8.11.1.7 -> 216.120.255.29 SIP/SDP Status: 200 OK, with
> session description
> 56.428281 216.120.255.29 -> 8.11.1.7 SIP Request: ACK
> sip:oursippproxy.net:5060;transport=udp
> 56.464595 8.11.1.7 -> oursippproxy.net SIP Request: ACK
> sip:oursippproxy.net:5060;transport=udp
> 61.956533 oursippproxy.net -> 8.11.1.7 SIP Request: BYE sip:
> 15184782411 at 216.120.255.29:5060
> 61.957965 8.11.1.7 -> 216.120.255.29 SIP Request: BYE sip:
> 15184782411 at 216.120.255.29:5060
> 61.987385 216.120.255.29 -> 8.11.1.7 SIP Status: 481 Call Leg/
> Transaction Does Not Exist
> 62.017630 8.11.1.7 -> oursippproxy.net SIP Status: 481 Call Leg/
> Transaction Does Not Exist
>
> On Oct 11, 2005, at 7:35 AM, Iqbal wrote:
>
>> Can you check to see if you have already received a BYE for that
>> call, some phones I had were sending there own Bye's after the GW had
>>
>> Iqbal
>>
>> Sam Lee wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>> I would like to know why does my BYE method are always replied with
>>> a 'Call Leg/Transaction does not exist' . How do they compare
>>> whether the transaction in the BYE method exist or not ? ( tag? ftag
>>> ? ) Are there any thing in the config that might cause this kind of
>>> problem ? Just want to highlight that all the calls are made in a
>>> good condition, everything except when the call is ending.
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you dont understand.
>>> Regards,
>>> Sam
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users at openser.org
>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users at openser.org
>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
More information about the Users
mailing list