[Users] Behavioural Difference Question - Regarding SER/OpenSER

[Tavis P]

I agree, although when porting from SER to OpenSER it broke some of my logic

Which led me to discover the wonders of branch routing, which was a much
better solution to my problem

Juha Heinanen wrote:

>Tavis P writes:
>
> > With OpenSER, using the same config, in the same situation it would
> > send the CANCEL first to itself and then to the endpoint.
>
>this is the correct behavior and avoiding it would be difficult, for
>example, when the request is forked by the second ser instance.
>
>-- juha
>
>
>  
>