[Users] How Effective is STUN?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla daniel at voice-system.ro
Sun Nov 20 14:46:26 CET 2005

 From what I have seen, the companies are protected mainly by symmetric 
NAT (more secure). In residential premises, it is hard to detect, there 
are a lot of devices. Sometimes the STUN implementation in the clients 
is broken, and do not help at all to label a NAT from SIP server side.


On 11/19/05 01:36, Tavis P wrote:
> I'm trying to find some statistics as to what the ratio of Cone vs
> Symmetric NAT solutions deployed in the world are, has anyone done some
> research into this?
> I'm curious what percentage of users in certain demographics (broadband
> clients, for example) i can expect to be serviced using STUN alone, so i
> can come up with some figure to help me build out my network
> Even just some anecdotal information of peoples experiences would be
> very useful
> Tavis
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users at openser.org
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

More information about the Users mailing list