[Users] Transaction already in Process

[Klaus Darilion]

Douglas Garstang wrote:
> We thought about sending calls back though OpenSER too, and in Asterisk referencing all dial commands with @proxy, but it really was not clear how things like ACD Queues with agent call backs would work for a start.

As openser is just a proxy there should be no problem as the features 
are still end2end (asterisk2sipphone)

klaus

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Iqbal [mailto:iqbal at gigo.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 11:26 AM
> To: Douglas Garstang
> Cc: Klaus Darilion; users at openser.org
> Subject: Re: [Users] Transaction already in Process
> 
> 
> jumping in alittle late on this one, but i read that routing the calls 
> back via openser is a pain rather than terminating on asterisk.
> 
> I had the same dilemma sometime ago when doing virtual pbx setup, but i 
> found it easier to send the call back to ser, and let it do all the 
> registration/routing etc, and just use asterisk for features. would be 
> interested on feedback on this....I may have designed it all wrong after 
> reading this :-)
> 
> Iqbal
> 
> Douglas Garstang wrote:
> 
> 
>>Klaus,
>>
>>That's it!
>>
>>Doug.
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at]
>>Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 12:25 AM
>>To: Douglas Garstang
>>Cc: users at openser.org
>>Subject: Re: [Users] Transaction already in Process
>>
>>
>>So how does it look like when Client A calls Client B? Is the signaling 
>>Like in the figure?
>>
>>         Asterisk
>>         /      \
>>        /        \
>>     Openser      \
>>      /            \
>>     /              \
>>Client A         Client B
>>
>>
>>regards
>>klaus
>>
>>
>>
>>Douglas Garstang wrote:
>> 
>>
>>
>>>Klaus,
>>>
>>>All calls are going through OpenSER from the phones. However, they don't go BACK to OpenSER. Asterisk terminates the call. Putting all calls BACK through OpenSER would be a nightmare. It would make a lot of Asterisk features such as ACD Queues, MeetMe Conferencing etc very hard to manage. I'm not even sure if they would work.
>>>
>>>Doug.
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at]
>>>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 8:23 AM
>>>To: Douglas Garstang
>>>Cc: users at openser.org
>>>Subject: Re: [Users] Transaction already in Process
>>>
>>>
>>>I can't explain it, but I do not like the idea replicating with failure 
>>>routes ...
>>>
>>>IMO it would be better to modify t_replicate to allow to replicate to 
>>>moultiple instances.
>>>
>>>Would i be possible to route all calls via openser? Then you do not need 
>>>the location info in the Asterisks.
>>>
>>>
>>>regards
>>>klaus
>>>
>>>Douglas Garstang wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>
>>>>Klaus,
>>>>
>>>>Asterisk can't use a database for location/contact information. It also has no native means to transfer registrations between itself and another Asterisk system. It can't even perform a user defined action when a phone registers... doesn't leave us with many options. Right now, using OpenSER to replicate (forward,t_relay,t_replicate whatever) seems to be working ok. Do you have any reason to believe it wouldn't scale up well?
>>>>
>>>>Doug.
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists at pernau.at]
>>>>Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:23 AM
>>>>To: Douglas Garstang
>>>>Cc: users at openser.org
>>>>Subject: Re: [Users] Transaction already in Process
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi Douglas!
>>>>
>>>>I still think it is a bad idea to replicate REGISTER to Asterisk 4 
>>>>times. Where does Asterisk store the location table? In a database? Why 
>>>>not replicate the location data on DB level?
>>>>
>>>>regards
>>>>klaus
>>>>
>>>>Douglas Garstang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Arrgh!
>>>>>
>>>>>Now I'm getting "t_newtran: transaction already in process" messages whenever I try to call t_relay() or t_replicate twice, even when the first attempt has FAILED. In the case of t_relay() I have new addresses in the destination set and I still get this error. Why? When you attempt to deliver, and it fails, how can to attempt again without getting those messages? What fundamental piece am I missing?
>>>>>
>>>>>How could I do this? Forget the fancy stuff. I don't care about checking for failure anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>>t_replicate("192.168.10.7","5060");
>>>>>t_replicate("192.168.10.8","5060");
>>>>>t_replicate("192.168.10.200","5060");
>>>>>
>>>>>Doug.
>>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Users mailing list
>>>>>Users at openser.org
>>>>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>       
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Users mailing list
>>Users at openser.org
>>http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>>
>>.
>>
>> 
>>
> 
> 
>