[Users] OpenSER and transport selection (SRV and NAPTR)
Joachim Fabini
Joachim.Fabini at tuwien.ac.at
Fri Dec 16 11:10:10 CET 2005
Hi Klaus,
> Maybe you can get a workaround using add_uri_param:
> http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.0.x/uri.html#AEN118
>
> add_uri_param("transport=tcp");
The solution is interesting. I see a slight problem
because we want to use tcp in the core and udp in the
access - basically the last proxy on the path must
rewrite the URI again to udp. But if the originating
client inserted already tcp... hmmmh...
> The t_relay should use TCP. A problem might be if there is already a
> transport parameter.
>
> I guess you can avoid this by do not changing the request URI but the
> destination URI (overrides the request URI). E.g. an example
> from Bogdan:
>
> avp_write("sip:openser.org;transport=tls","i:11");
> avp_pushto("$duri","i:11");
>
> Probably you have to use regexp to copy the existing RURI
> into an AVP, strip the existing transport parameter, add
> the new one, and write it into the DURI.
The d-uri approach sounds promising. I'll go through the
scenario to see if there's some problem that I do not find
at first glance.
Thanks for your help,
best regards
--Joachim
>
> regards
> klaus
>
>
> > Seeing the roadmap for 1.1 I realized that NAPTR solves
> > part of this problem. Is there already any estimation
> > when NAPTR implementation will be available in OpenSER?
> >
> > I intentionally said "part of the problem" because
> > NAPTR delegates the decision on the transport to the
> > destination DNS. But: our own proxy might also be
> > required to control the selected transport.
> > It seems to me quite flexible to implement a
> > proxy-hosted NAPTR emulation and specify the list
> > of requested protocols, e.g.
> > t_relay_to_transport("tls","tcp",0)
> > specifies that t_relay should firstly generate a
> > SRV DNS query for _sips._tcp.mydomain.org, if this
> > fails to query for _sip._tcp.mydomain.org and then
> > give up - if I don't want UDP.
> >
> > This saves one DNS query (NAPTR) and enables a proxy
> > to control what protocols it uses for contacting the
> > next hop.
> >
> > Finally, I believe that the interface to t_relay_naptr()
> > (or whatever the naptr relaying will be called) should
> > support selection of desired protocols, e.g.
> > t_relay_to_naptr("tls", "tcp", "udp") where entries
> > can be left empty to indicate that this transport is
> > not desired. The argument order might even overrule
> > the NAPTR response transport ranking - finally we
> > connect and thus decide on what transport we prefer... ;)
> >
> > Any comments warmly welcome,
> > best regards
> > --Joachim
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users at openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
>
More information about the Users
mailing list