[Users] #DEFINE equivalent?

[Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya]

because i didn't think of it?

:-)

cheers, and thanx

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:

> Kanakatti Mahesh Subramanya wrote:
>
>> I totally agree.
>>
>> Personally, I've been ripping out large chunks of my config file, and 
>> replacing it with varioud avpops based stuff - it may be *slightly* 
>> more convoluted, but it is completely database configurable, and 
>> hence easier to maintain
>>
>> re: rr, its actually neither. Its a static, which i'm using to 
>> identify NAT'ed clients to account for re-INVITEs
>
>
> why don't you use the append_rr_param() function to added the NAT 
> identifier to the RR hdr? do a normal record_route() and if nat is 
> detected, add the param
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Kanakatti,
>>>
>>> I'm for m4'ing  (for the moment) for two reasons:
>>>    1) since we can do it with m4, I prefer to use the cycles for 
>>> something still missing;
>>>    2) using dynamic parameters (like via AVPs) reduce the 
>>> performance - time to look for the AVP and most critical the 
>>> impossibility of calling fixup functions at startup (which will 
>>> force to fix params at runtime, for each processing).
>>>
>>> regarding the record_route_preset() - do you use dynamic parameters 
>>> or dynamic rr URI?
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> bogdan
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mahesh.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 332 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20050830/3cf093bc/attachment.vcf