[SR-Users] unable to receive UDP
dem at htsweb.com
dem at htsweb.com
Wed Oct 13 02:44:00 CEST 2021
Hi David,
I agree completely, referencing the IP 'should' be directing the network layers
to that IP as assigned to the interface.
You can see documented in the config (below) that is exactly what I have used.
I've been testing for days with the local IP that is assigned to interface em3.
You can even see from the tcpdump (below) that the SIP INVITE was being
delivered to em3 using that IP.
We have 12 SIP trunks running for years, using the 1:1 NAT, so this works fine
in our networks. Been doing networks for years (lots), 1st thing I check is netstat.
Without any question, it was configured correctly. Netstat ONLY showed the ONE
listing for UDP 10.102.88.81:5060 There weren't multiple listeners - just the
one. And, it would disappear when kamailio was stopped. Returned on kamailio start.
Somehow the kamailio io wait stuff is ignoring interfaces other than the first
one. All I did was move the IP from em3 to em1, restart the network and restart
kamailio.
This could be Centos 7 or a Dell driver. Appreciate the help.
Thanks,
Dan
David Villasmil wrote on 10/12/21 6:26 PM:
> use the
>
> listen=udp:YOUR-LOCAL-IP:5060
>
> then do a netstat to see if it's listening on 5060
>
>
> Regards,
>
> David Villasmil
> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com <mailto:david.villasmil.work at gmail.com>
> phone: +34669448337
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 11:17 PM <dem at htsweb.com <mailto:dem at htsweb.com>> wrote:
>
> Okay, think I discovered something....
>
> I'm attempting to run the kamailio on interface em3 - no joy. I moved the
> 10.102.88.81 ip to the em1 interface. kamailio is showing the UDP packets
> as received (via my horribly simple config below).
>
> This test also answers the firewall question, UDP port is allowed.
>
> So, that prompts the question... how do you use kamailio with UDP on a
> specific interface ? I'm thinking it might not do it currently ?
>
> Also, forgive me if I messed up the prior reply to the list.
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> dem at htsweb.com <mailto:dem at htsweb.com> wrote on 10/12/21 5:28 PM:
>> Hello,
>>
>> The tcpdump (below) shows packet reaching em3 interface. The firewalld
>> command (below) shows UDP port 5060 open.
>>
>> netcat doesn't do specific interfaces. Can't do ALL interfaces, since em4
>> is a pcap of hundreds of thousands of live UDP 5060.
>>
>> I'll have to write a standalone to prove that the firewall allows UDP
>> 5060 through the em3 interface, post firewall... (betting it does).
>> Should have test prog tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>>
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote on 10/12/21 4:27 PM:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> tcpdump and other network sniffers (e.g., ngrep, sngrep) capture the sip
>>> traffic before firewall, so even if you see packets with them, the
>>> application can still not get them due to firewall.
>>>
>>> To test, you can replace kamailio with netcat listening on UDP port 5060
>>> and see if it receives the sip traffic.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>> On 12.10.21 19:08, dem at htsweb.com <mailto:dem at htsweb.com> wrote:
>>>> After 4 (long) days of trying to receive any UDP SIP, I'm hoping
>>>> someone can point out what I'm doing wrong. I've looked at the kamailio
>>>> code. I'm beginning to think it's the 'polling' code, but it looks
>>>> fine. It could be Centos or a Dell network driver, but not seeing any
>>>> errors anywhere.
>>>>
>>>> - stock build/compile...
>>>> Version: kamailio 5.5.2 (x86_64/linux) 0d53d9
>>>> Compile flags: USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS,
>>>> DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, Q_MALLOC,
>>>> F_MALLOC, TLSF_MALLOC, DBG_SR_MEMORY, USE_FUTEX,
>>>> FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR,
>>>> USE_DST_BLOCKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>>> MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE=262144
>>>> MAX_URI_SIZE=1024
>>>> BUF_SIZE=65535
>>>> DEFAULT PKG_SIZE=8MB
>>>> DEFAULT SHM_SIZE=64MB
>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024
>>>> TCP poll methods: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select
>>>> Source code revision ID: 0d53d9
>>>> Compiled with: gcc 4.8.5
>>>> Compiled architecture: x86_64
>>>> Compiled on: 08:44:19 Oct 11 2021
>>>>
>>>> Running Centos 7 all updated. Dell R630.
>>>> # sestatus
>>>> SELinux status: disabled
>>>> # firewall-cmd --list-all
>>>> ports: 5666/tcp 873/tcp 873/udp 80/tcp 443/tcp 5060/tcp 5060/udp
>>>> 5061/tcp 5061/udp
>>>>
>>>> - Just trying to send SIP INVITE from trunk provider to R630 kamailio...
>>>> (SIP trunk) UDP 172.200.200.202:5060 <http://172.200.200.202:5060> ->
>>>> (firewall) UDP 172.250.250.162:5060 <http://172.250.250.162:5060> ->
>>>> 1:1 NAT -> (R630) UDP 10.102.88.81:5060 <http://10.102.88.81:5060>
>>>>
>>>> - I can 'see' the packet hit the em3 network...
>>>> # tcpdump -i em3 -e -vv -n port 5060
>>>> 11:53:33.260892 99:99:ef:3e:69:c1 > 99:99:1c:48:4e:e3, ethertype IPv4
>>>> (0x0800), length 1366: (tos 0x0, ttl 54, id 20430, offset 0, flags
>>>> [none], proto UDP (17), length 1352)
>>>> 172.200.200.202.sip > 10.102.88.81.sip: [udp sum ok] SIP, length: 1324
>>>> INVITE sip:+18005551234 at 172.250.250.162:5060
>>>> <mailto:sip:+18005551234 at 172.250.250.162:5060> SIP/2.0
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> At this point, I just need to see a SIP INVITE received. Then I can go
>>>> back to working on a real config.
>>>>
>>>> I've tried with TCP on/off, listening on all networks, alias on/off,
>>>> strace and everything else I could think of.Truly appreciate any guidance.
>>>>
>>>> Tried every sample config possible, but I just need to test receiving
>>>> the SIP UDP packet, so this 'should' be minimum config...
>>>>
>>>> #!KAMAILIO
>>>> debug=9
>>>> log_stderror=no
>>>> log_facility=LOG_LOCAL0
>>>> log_prefix="{$mt $hdr(CSeq) $ci} "
>>>> children=2
>>>> disable_tcp=yes
>>>> udp4_raw=on
>>>> auto_aliases=no
>>>> alias="sbc01.mysite.com <http://sbc01.mysite.com>"
>>>> listen=udp:10.102.88.81:5060
>>>>
>>>> loadmodule "debugger.so"
>>>> loadmodule "jsonrpcs.so"
>>>> loadmodule "kex.so"
>>>> loadmodule "corex.so"
>>>> loadmodule "sl.so"
>>>> loadmodule "rr.so"
>>>> loadmodule "pv.so"
>>>> loadmodule "textops.so"
>>>> loadmodule "siputils.so"
>>>> loadmodule "xlog.so"
>>>> loadmodule "sanity.so"
>>>> loadmodule "ctl.so"
>>>> loadmodule "cfg_rpc.so"
>>>>
>>>> modparam("debugger", "cfgtrace", 1)
>>>>
>>>> request_route {
>>>> xlog("SIP received xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\n");
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> # kamcmd ps
>>>> 11578 main process - attendant
>>>> 11579 udp receiver child=0 sock=10.102.88.81:5060
>>>> <http://10.102.88.81:5060>
>>>> 11580 udp receiver child=1 sock=10.102.88.81:5060
>>>> <http://10.102.88.81:5060>
>>>> 11581 slow timer
>>>> 11583 timer
>>>> 11584 secondary timer
>>>> 11585 JSONRPCS FIFO
>>>> 11586 JSONRPCS DATAGRAM
>>>> 11587 ctl handler
>>>>
>>>> - I get plenty of logging, but the logging just waits here...
>>>> Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: INFO: ctl
>>>> [io_listener.c:210]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: using epoll_lt
>>>> as the io watch method (auto detected)
>>>> Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:374]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 4800)
>>>> called from core: core/io_wait.c: init_io_wait(469)
>>>> Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10059]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:419]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010,
>>>> 65456) returns address 0x7fd2a8c652d8 frag. 0x7fd2a8c652a0 (size=65456)
>>>> on 1 -th hit
>>>> Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:419]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 4800)
>>>> returns address 0x7fd2a8c652d8 frag. 0x7fd2a8c652a0 (size=4800) on 1
>>>> -th hit
>>>> Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:374]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 2400)
>>>> called from core: core/io_wait.c: init_io_wait(516)
>>>> Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: <core>
>>>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:419]: qm_malloc(): qm_malloc(0x7fd2a8bae010, 2400)
>>>> returns address 0x7fd2a8c66600 frag. 0x7fd2a8c665c8 (size=2400) on 1
>>>> -th hit
>>>> Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: ctl
>>>> [io_listener.c:246]: io_listen_loop(): io_listen_loop: adding socket 8,
>>>> type 2, transport 3 (/var/run/kamailio//kamailio_ctl)
>>>> Oct 12 11:38:04 sbc01 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[10060]: DEBUG: ctl
>>>> [../../core/io_wait.h:375]: io_watch_add(): DBG:
>>>> io_watch_add(0x7fd2a70a5360, 8, 2, 0x2439960), fd_no=0
>>>>
>>>> - The only other thing that I see is transport 3. Isn't that a UNIXS_SOCK?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> __________________________________________________________
>>>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
>>>> *sr-users at lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>>>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
>>>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>>>> *https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla --www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
>>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - Online
>>> Nov 08-11, 2021 (Europe Timezone) - Nov 22-25, 2021 (America Timezone)
>>> *https://www.asipto.com/sw/kamailio-advanced-training-online/
>>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
> * sr-users at lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
> the sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
> * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20211012/9ea51c12/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list