[SR-Users] Architecture - your opinion is welcome and your experience too

[Sergiu Pojoga]

Heads-up though, before you get over excited about the suggested simplicity
of using PATH. Don't try it if your asterisk farm runs on PJSIP - it simply
won't work.

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:53 AM Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>
wrote:

> Hi Daian,
>
> Rather than reoriginaring registrations with Kamailio’s UAC module, I
> suggest you look into the Path extension and Kamailio’s PATH module as a
> means of relaying registrations inward to Asterisk.
>
> You can still benefit from security features of Kamailio in that case,
> while removing 90% of the complexity in your proposal. :-)
>
> — Alex
>
> —
> Sent from mobile, with due apologies for brevity and errors.
>
> On May 28, 2021, at 10:24 AM, Daian Conrad <daian.conrad at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Hi all,
>
> I am studying and improving my understanding of how kamailio works, I have
> used asterisk for a few years(and starting learning freeswitch too), and I
> use an application to manage extensions, trunks and other media services.
> I'm building a new scenario where kamailio is facing the internet and the
> asterisk(s) are internally on private networks, would like the opinion of
> you who are more experienced with more complex environments than me.
>
>  I cannot change the application that uses asterisk for now, due to the
> effort to develop event monitoring, cdr and other features that I use today.
>
> I imagined and working on making kamailio functional by saving the
> registration of extensions with location on DB, and with the UAC module
> making the registration of extensions on asterisk(s), replacing the
> registration address with the address of kamailio, its functional at this
> point, but data replication with extensions turns things some hard to
> mantain manually.
>
> I think about using the DNS domain for each asterisk and make this
> forwarded, each asterisk response for a fqdn and its extensions, like (
> pbx1.example.com is forwarded to asterisk1, pbx2.example.com to
> asterisk2) and so on.
>
> Read about the dispatcher, rr, htable,carrierroute module to identify the
> domain and forward based on that , none made me sure to be chosen for the
> role, however, everyone has the resources to do it.
>
> I am very wrong to follow this path, which option in your opinion is
> "less" painful for a beginner apprentice like me?
>
> I think about simple proxy based on domain requests(all messages and
> dialogs) to asterisk where is responsible for the domain(realm)
> but, loss the ability to use great security features of kamailio, is what
> I understand now with the knowledge I have.
>
> Sorry and forgive my english, i'm not very good at writing.
>
>
> --
> ================
> **Daian Conrad**
>
> E-mail: daian.conrad at gmail.com
> OpenS Team (DaCoD)
> Linux user: #248912
>
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
>  * sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
> the sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>  * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> __________________________________________________________
> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
>   * sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to
> the sender!
> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>   * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20210528/cecda8f1/attachment.htm>