[SR-Users] Kamailio $Rp variable showing wrong port
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Thu Jun 24 14:55:43 CEST 2021
Hello,
I will check the logs once I finish a few other tasks.
Meanwhile, maybe you can try to set the socket per destination to see if
it makes any difference, like
1 sip:172.27.44.125:5060;transport=tcp 0 0
duid=sample-cas;maxload=1000;*socket=tcp:172.27.45.219:5060*
Cheers,
Daniel
On 24.06.21 12:48, Shahid Hussain wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> Please find the debug logs attached. You can refer OPTION message of
> timestamp 18:43:35 though there are multiple request.
>
> There is a line in log says tcp worker on 8080 though I have not
> specified in kamailio.cfg.
> Jun 24 18:43:35 localhost kamailio: 44(11820) DEBUG: <core>
> [core/tcp_main.c:4517]: handle_tcpconn_ev(): sending to child, events 1
> Jun 24 18:43:35 localhost kamailio: 44(11820) DEBUG: <core>
> [core/tcp_main.c:4190]: send2child(): selected tcp worker idx:6
> proc:42 pid:11818 for activity on [tcp:172.27.45.219:8080
> <http://172.27.45.219:8080>], 0x7fca749c2d60
>
> Attached kamailio.cfg also.
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 3:31 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> can you set debug=3 in kamailio.cfg and then reproduce the case
> and send here all the syslog message printed by kamailio?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On 24.06.21 11:37, Shahid Hussain wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>> Attaching the filtered pcap with response for an OPTION message.
>> I am also attaching the all pcap with no filter having all SIP
>> messages being communicated, there is no data coming on port 8080.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Shahid
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 1:21 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> the pcap shows only the OPTIONS requests, not the replies.
>> Maybe you have to capture the traffic also on 8080 to catch
>> it. It would important to see the reply and where it is sent
>> back to kamailio.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 24.06.21 09:24, Shahid Hussain wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have configured the dispatcher default socket as below IP
>>> , the expectation here is that kamailio should send all
>>> traffic from this IP (port will be ephemeral) over TCP.
>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_default_socket",
>>> "tcp:172.27.45.219:5060 <http://172.27.45.219:5060>")
>>>
>>> This system also listens on port 8080 which is meant for
>>> websocket communication (dispatcher communication is over
>>> non websocket).
>>>
>>> Kamailio is sending an OPTION message to dispatcher IP over
>>> TCP on 5060 and getting 200 OK response but Kamailio
>>> considering the response is on websocket port 8080 ,$Rp
>>> value is 8080.
>>>
>>> onreply_route {
>>> if (($Rp == 8080 ) && !(proto == WS))
>>> {
>>> xlog("L_WARN", "SIP response received on $Rp
>>> protocol:proto RIP:$Ri SIP:$si method:$rm cid:$ci
>>> replystatus:$rs len:$ml\n");
>>> xlog("L_WARN", "SIP message received: $mb\n");
>>> drop;
>>> }
>>>
>>> .....
>>> ....
>>> }
>>>
>>> Following is the output of above logs:
>>> Jun 24 15:10:08 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[6223]: WARNING:
>>> {2 10 OPTIONS 1ab6573a4640823b-6209 at 172.27.45.198
>>> <mailto:1ab6573a4640823b-6209 at 172.27.45.198>} <script>: SIP
>>> response received on 8080 protocol:tcp RIP:172.27.45.219
>>> SIP:172.27.44.125 method:OPTIONS
>>> cid:1ab6573a4640823b-6209 at 172.27.45.198
>>> <mailto:cid%3A1ab6573a4640823b-6209 at 172.27.45.198>
>>> replystatus:200 len:416
>>>
>>> Jun 24 15:10:08 localhost /usr/sbin/kamailio[6223]: WARNING:
>>> {2 10 OPTIONS 1ab6573a4640823b-6209 at 172.27.45.198
>>> <mailto:1ab6573a4640823b-6209 at 172.27.45.198>} <script>: SIP
>>> message received: SIP/2.0 200 OK#015#012Via: SIP/2.0/TCP
>>> 172.27.45.198:5060;branch=z9hG4bK4526.92b79f34000000000000000000000000.0;received=172.27.45.219#015#012From:
>>> <sip:dispatcher at localhost>;tag=1ae6c95d92f9ea9ce927f715de5c48c8-eb141029#015#012To:
>>> <sip:172.27.44.125:5060;transport=tcp>;tag=a9d542e0#015#012Call-ID:
>>> 1ab6573a4640823b-6209 at 172.27.45.198#015#012CSeq
>>> <http://1ab6573a4640823b-6209@172.27.45.198#015%23012CSeq>:
>>> 10 OPTIONS#015#012Allow: INVITE, ACK, BYE, OPTIONS, CANCEL,
>>> INFO, UPDATE, NOTIFY#015#012Content-Length: 0
>>>
>>>
>>> Also I have attached a pcap.
>>>
>>> Dispatcher.list configuration:
>>> 1 sip:172.27.44.125:5060;transport=tcp 0 0
>>> duid=sample-cas;maxload=1000
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shahid
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________________
>>> Kamailio - Users Mailing List - Non Commercial Discussions
>>> * sr-users at lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>>> Important: keep the mailing list in the recipients, do not reply only to the sender!
>>> Edit mailing list options or unsubscribe:
>>> * https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20210624/d1c98c7a/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list