[SR-Users] kamailio 5.4.5 crash after dialog [dlg_hash.c:1182]: next_state_dlg(): bogus event 2 in state 5 for dlg
Trevor Hemsley
themsley at voiceflex.com
Wed Jun 2 19:00:13 CEST 2021
Hi
We've seen a few occurrences of this crash since we implemented kamailio
5.4.5 for our inbound call traffic. Preceding the crash we always get a
message in the logs about "dialog [dlg_hash.c:1182]: next_state_dlg():
bogus event 2 in state 5 for dlg" and whenever we see that message, we
get the crash.
Jun 1 10:12:14 thissystem /usr/sbin/kamailio[20001]: CRITICAL: {2 1
INVITE 6787142-3831531134-1330894187 at some.telco.domain} dialog
[dlg_hash.c:1182]: next_state_dlg(): bogus event 2 in state 5 for dlg
0x7fae153d3cf0 [3973:6059] with clid
'82608924-3831089984-1833452161 at some.telco.domain' and tags
'3831089984-684203260' ''
The crash happens on line 879 of
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/src/modules/dialog/dlg_db_handler.c
SET_STR_VALUE(values+7, cell->bind_addr[DLG_CALLER_LEG]->sock_str);
Looking at gdb, I see that cell->bind_addr[DLG_CALLER_LEG] == 0 so
trying to use it results in the segfault. I have thought about patching
that to check for bind_addr being set and bypassing that line if not but
I do not think it's the right fix though it probably would avoid the
current crash (and do odd things later instead!). I did check that
everything else in that function that uses DLG_CALLER_LEG is set
correctly and it appears that it is - or at least if not correctly then
they are at least set!
The "bogus event 2 in state 5" message is coming out from line 1143 in
src/modules/ims_dialog/dlg_hash.c
case DLG_EVENT_RPL1xx:
switch (dlg->state) {
case DLG_STATE_UNCONFIRMED:
case DLG_STATE_EARLY:
dlg->state = DLG_STATE_EARLY;
break;
default:
log_next_state_dlg(event, dlg);
}
break;
(I didn't really understand why it would set dlg->state =
DLG_STATE_EARLY if it's already DLG_STATE_EARLY but...)
I have a couple of core dumps of this from the last day or two - usually
seems to crash at least once a week on our pair of kamailio inbound
servers. If there's any more info I can provide to help fix this
properly rather than my proposed bodge then feel free to ask.
Trevor Hemsley
Disclaimer
The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more visit the Mimecast website.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20210602/4e4489b4/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list