[SR-Users] Kamailio/rtpengine not populating mos avp stats?

[Richard Fuchs]

This should be fixed now.

Cheers

On 20/07/2021 20.23, [ EXT ] Anthony Joseph Messina wrote:
> Yep.  No problem -- that's why I wanted to ask first.  Thanks again.  I'll
> keep an eye out.  -A
>
> On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 6:46:40 PM CDT Richard Fuchs wrote:
>> I haven't had a chance to look at it yet. There's been a lot of construction
>> going on in current master (and some more to come) so it's quite possible
>> that this is fallout from that.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> On 20/07/2021 19.15, [ EXT ] Anthony Joseph Messina wrote:
>> Thanks, Henning.  I rebuilt with that commit reverted and it didn't make a
>> difference.  I wasn't sure if there were rtpengine-side changes or kamailio-
>> side changes that might be necessary.  I've seen @rfuchs chime in on this
>> list from time-to-time so I'll gather up some more information before
>> filing a ticket.  -A
>>
>> On Tuesday, July 20, 2021 9:00:38 AM CDT Henning Westerholt wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> one month ago was a fix in this area (4399fe5243), but not much changes
>> since then.
>>
>> If no reply from somebody else that observe a similar issue, just create an
>> issue on our github tracker with more details.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Henning
>>
>> --
>> Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
>> Kamailio services - https://gilawa.com
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Anthony
>> Joseph Messina Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2021 7:06 AM
>> To: Kamailio Users Mailing List <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>> Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio/rtpengine not populating mos avp stats?
>>
>> I'm using Kamailio compiled from the current 5.5 tip (1f9f6fff6e), and
>> rtpengine compiled from the current master (6e160da4).
>>
>> While rtpengine is working quite well, within the past month or so, I've
>> noticed that Kamailio isn't populating the mos* related AVPs.  I see
>> continued upstream rtpengine work stream handling, etc. -- should I wait or
>> try to debug?
>>
>> Thanks -A