[SR-Users] websocket transport protocol in Record-Route header

[Juha Heinanen]

No matter if UA uses ws or wss to connect to Kamailio, when K routes
INVITE from this UA and record_route() is called, K always adds
;transport=ws parameter to Record-Route URI, for example,

Record-Route: <sip:192.168.43.83:7998;transport=ws;r2=on;lr>

In this test, Kamailio is listening on that port like this:

# SIP over WebSocket
listen=tls:192.168.43.83:7998

Why doesn't K in this case add ;transport=wss to the R-R URI?

-- Juha