[SR-Users] Confusion about TCP worker ports

[Alex Balashov]

Daniel,

Just to make sure I understood this:

On 10/30/20 4:34 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

> confirming what Henning said that dispatcher is not using uac module,
> not to be any doubt about that. Actually, uac modules uses some of the
> TM-UAC functions as dispatcher module, but between dispatcher and uac
> module is no relation, no dependency. Sockets can be enforced in
> dispatcher via socket attribute (I think is also a modparam for a global
> need), however see next remarks about what can happen.
So, there's a common set of UAC request synthesis APIs which are 
actually exported by TM, but used by both dispatcher and the UAC module 
per se?

-- Alex

-- 
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/