[SR-Users] Drop calls with response 200 without previous 180/183 reponses
Valter Nogueira
valter at fastway.com.br
Mon Oct 5 15:04:52 CEST 2020
Thank you people. It seems an easy approach using htable.
I was wondering that this is not compliant with RFC 3261, since a proxy
should not change sip responses.
In fact not only I should change the sip response but I should send a BYE
on behalf of the UAC. It seems like a B2BUA
Em sáb, 3 de out de 2020 12:45, David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> escreveu:
> Kamailio is so cool, you could even do it without the dialog module. You
> could simply use a hash table (htable module) and when/if a 183/180 is
> received store the callid in the table (with an expiration). Anytime a 200
> is received check the table (it’s in memory, so really fast), if not found,
> reject.
> Super simple.
>
>
> On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 13:51, Valentin Christoph <
> Christoph.Valentin at kontron.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I am not quite sure, but I would try to store a long-term flag with the
>> help of the dialog module.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [...]The dialog module provides dialog awareness for the Kamailio proxy.
>> It's functionality is to keep track of the current dialogs, to offer
>> information about them (e.g. how many dialogs are active), and to manage
>> various characteristics of dialogs. The module
>>
>> exports several functions that can be used directly from the
>> configuration route script as well as functions for the RPC interface. [...]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [...]10.6. $dlg_var(key)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> This is a read/write variable that can be used to store custom values
>> assigned with a dialog (e.g. the URI of a billing-server, an assigned
>> emergency-server). This pseudo-variable will be available only for
>> subsequential requests after doing loose_route().
>>
>>
>>
>> Note: You will receive "NULL", if there is no dialog for this
>> request.[...]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Hint: ACK is a subsequential request
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Anyway, I am wondering if your approach would be compliant to RFC 3261.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> KR
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>> *Von:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> im Auftrag von
>> Valter Nogueira <valter at fastway.com.br>
>>
>>
>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 2. Oktober 2020 17:01
>>
>>
>> *An:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>>
>>
>> *Betreff:* [SR-Users] Drop calls with response 200 without previous
>> 180/183 reponses
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I would like to use Kamailio to drop every call that is answered with no
>> previous 180 / 183 responses or with 180 / 183 responses with no media
>> attached (no SDP?).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Is it possible? How could I accomplish this?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Valter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> --
> Regards,
>
> David Villasmil
> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
> phone: +34669448337
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20201005/fee12d3b/attachment.htm>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list