[SR-Users] The Algorithm “13” - latency optimized dispatching

Joel Serrano joel at textplus.com
Fri Nov 13 23:52:09 CET 2020


Thanks Juha!! I have a perfect use case for this algorithm.

Is it tryable ?

Joel.

On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:57 AM David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:

> Nice!
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 at 22:01, Julien Chavanton <jchavanton at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> About The Algorithm “13” - latency optimized dispatching,
>>
>> Is now reviewed once and tested, it will most likely be ready to merge
>> soon.
>>
>> I want to share my thoughts on it one more time as it is not too late to
>> get more feedback before we merge.
>>
>> I think it is the best algorithm in most use cases, here is why :
>>
>> It is providing round-robin and fail-over with automatic
>> de-prioritization of slow/unresponsive gateways.
>>
>> You probably asked yourself the following questions in the past :
>> "How do I set the thresholds to put a gateway out of service ?"
>>
>> *ds_probing_threshold*, *ds_inactive_threshold* and timers ...
>>
>> - If your thresholds are too strict, you may end up running out of
>> gateway.
>> - If your thresholds are too tolerant, you may end up adding excessive
>> delays to call establishment and using degraded gateways.
>>
>> The automatic de-prioritization can help to address this concern more
>> efficiently by providing more flexibility.
>>
>> - it can react faster than lets say 2 consecutive timeouts.
>> - it will not disable gateways but simply de-prioritize / reorder them if
>> needed.
>>
>> The only main drawback I can imagine is when you always need to evenly
>> distribute calls using round-robin.
>> It may be needed sometimes but in this case it means you are willing
>> accept to send calls to a degraded gateway or trough degraded network paths.
>>
>> Even if you may select to preset a mixture of round-robin sets, thanks to
>> *ds_select_routes* however it will stay static, needs to be configured
>> precisely, and will not react to degradation automatically.
>>
>> I hope this will help use to protect QoS and lower latency of calls
>> routed by Kamailio.
>>
>> Feel free to let me know what you think
>> Julien
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
> --
> Regards,
>
> David Villasmil
> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
> phone: +34669448337
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20201113/da263cf4/attachment.htm>


More information about the sr-users mailing list