[SR-Users] Kamailio in VMware with Fault Tolerance on

[Sergio Charrua]

Patrick,

I would rely on Corosync and Pacemaker for failover, using a shared IP
address between (active + passive) servers. Once the active goes down,
Pacemaker switches the shared IP to the passive server that will then
become the active server.

Hope this helps,

*Sérgio Charrua*

*www.voip.pt <http://www.voip.pt/>*

Tel.: +351  <callto:+351+91+104+12+66>21 130 71 77

Email : *sergio.charrua at voip.pt <sergio.charrua at voip.pt>*

This message and any files or documents attached are strictly confidential
or otherwise legally protected.

It is intended only for the individual or entity named. If you are not the
named addressee or have received this email in error, please inform the
sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy or disclose
it or its contents or use it for any purpose. Please also note that
transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free.








On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 9:55 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> is the active-active architecture still relying on a single shared ip that
> is migrated between the systems, or do you use two shared ips and each
> system is associated with one in normal operational mode? Or is anycast?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> On 03.11.20 03:38, Patrick Wakano wrote:
>
> Thanks for the info Daniel! Much appreciated!
> Our previous architecture was active-standby with VIP and keepalived,
> however we are moving towards an active-active approach.
> Cheers,
> Patrick Wakano
>
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 at 04:40, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I try to stay away from infrastructure, so I do not know the exact
>> technical details and whether it uses Fault Tolerance, but I have customers
>> using VMware, some with rather busy sip servers (50000+ active users) and
>> all runs smooth there. But in this specific case, there is no DMQ, data is
>> shared via database (MySQL), the secondary system being in standby ready to
>> take over the IP of the primary server.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>> On 02.11.20 07:31, Patrick Wakano wrote:
>>
>> Hello list,
>> Hope you are all good!
>>
>> Recently, the issue https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2535 has
>> been investigated and the utilization of the feature vsphere Fault
>> Tolerance is linked as a source of network latency and probably CPU
>> allocation latency. This increases the chances of the mentioned issue to
>> happen.
>> So I would just like to ask if anyone out there is using Kamilio in a
>> VMware environment with Fault Tolerance on? How is the experience?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Patrick Wakano
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users at lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
>>
>> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20201103/8e4b265d/attachment.htm>