[SR-Users] record_route_preset and set_advertised_address in branch_route

[Володимир Іванець]

Hello Sergiu,

Thank you for the suggestion. Sorry, I had to clarify that I'm using
parallel forking and *t_save_lumps* look like it's meant for serial forking.

Thank you!

пт, 29 трав. 2020 о 18:55 Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas at gmail.com> пише:

> Check out the  t_save_lumps() function, which should solve your problem.
>
> https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.3.x/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_save_lumps
>
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:12 AM Володимир Іванець <
> volodyaivanets at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm having interesting behavior and wanted to ask if someone knows if
>> this is correct or not. Kamailio v5.3.3. is used.
>>
>> Asterisk sends INVITE to Kamailio. Kamailio performs lookup. Some
>> contacts require Record-Route and Via headers adjustments before sending
>> out INVITEs. I use functions *record_route_preset* and
>> *set_advertised_address* in the branch_route.
>>
>> Everything works as expected when branch 0 does not require changes. But
>> when it does, changes are applied to all other branches as well.
>>
>> Is it by design or it's a bug?
>>
>> Thank you!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200529/5bf5bdd9/attachment.html>