[SR-Users] Parallel forking and rtpengine handling

[Yuriy Gorlichenko]

It is. In this case manage = delete

On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, 19:16 George Diamantopoulos, <georgediam at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 18:28, Richard Fuchs <rfuchs at sipwise.com> wrote:
>
>> On 22/01/2020 11.06, Sebastian Damm wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > our scenario is the following: We have two clients registered to our
>> > Kamailio server, one with a TLS capable phone, one via websocket. Now,
>> > when a call comes in, the call is forked and is sent out to both
>> > clients. rtpengine handling is done in the branch route, so there are
>> > two offers, and we use the "via-branch" parameter.
>> >
>> > Now, when one branch answers the call, what happens to the other
>> > branch? I there a way to delete the other branch? How and in which
>> > route? Or does Kamailio do this automatically?
>>
>> You do it the same way as you handle an answer: You issue a delete with
>> the via-branch option.
>>
> Doesn't this happen automatically when one uses rtpengine_manage() in the
> failure_route?
>
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200122/cebb5f1a/attachment.html>