[SR-Users] doubt about xflags

[David Escartin]

Hello Daniel

i made some more tests and i could see that it's after
executing msg_apply_changes function that the xflag is lost. The original
message transaction flags remain activated after msg_apply_changes.

i did an execution on debug but i saw no information more than

 2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171: We
activate TEST_XFLAG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171:
TEST_XFLAG TRUE!!!!
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:3262]:
sip_msg_update_buffer(): SIP message content updated - reparsing
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:610]: parse_msg(): SIP
Request:
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:612]: parse_msg():
 method:  <INVITE>
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:614]: parse_msg():  uri:
  <sip:7777777 at 2.2.2.26:5060>
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:616]: parse_msg():
 version: <SIP/2.0>
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param():
Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=6
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param():
Found param type 232, <branch> =
<z9hG4bK-5aaf0472f30d11e68aeff8bc1239f520>; state=6
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:1303]: parse_via_param():
Found param type 253, <sig> = <74e198e2>; state=16
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_via.c:2639]: parse_via(): end of
header reached, state=5
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:498]: parse_headers(): Via
found, flags=2
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:500]: parse_headers():
this is the first via
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/parse_addr_spec.c:864]:
parse_addr_spec(): end of header reached, state=10
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:171]: get_hdr_field():
<To> [83]; uri=[sip:+9934355692006294 at 1.1.14.173;transport=udp;user=phone]
 2(5231) DEBUG: <core> [core/parser/msg_parser.c:174]: get_hdr_field(): to
body ["+0034355692006294"<sip:+9934355692006294 at 1.1.14.173
;transport=udp;user=phone>
], to tag []
 2(5231) INFO: Talos-Test Call 500000 / Call-ID 1-25549 at 1.1.18.171:
TEST_XFLAG after msg_apply_changes FALSE!!!!


best regards
david

El jue., 20 feb. 2020 a las 20:45, Daniel-Constantin Mierla (<
miconda at gmail.com>) escribió:

> Hello,
>
> have you set the flags before creating the transaction? Can you test if
> you set a normal flag and an xflag at the same place in request route, is
> the first visible in onreply route and the xflag not?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
> On 20.02.20 18:05, David Escartin wrote:
>
> Dear all
>
> one quick question, reading the module corex doc, seems that xflag are
> message(transaction) flags. But I made a test and seems for some reason the
> flag is not seeing activated at the onreply_route, when it's activated on
> the request route. Seemed more like a script flag behaviour. Maybe I'm
> missing something?
>
> thanks a lot and regards
> david
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users at lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training - March 9-11, 2020, Berlin - www.asipto.com
> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20200221/2a75b596/attachment.html>