[SR-Users] Kamailio propagates 180 and 200 OK OUT OF ORDER

Luis Rojas G. luis.rojas at sixbell.com
Thu Apr 9 14:21:37 CEST 2020


Actually, I was looking at the code yesterday, trying to figure it if 
it's just a validation, to not accept reply_route(), or if it needs some 
more logic to work inside that block.  It's still an option.

Best regards,

Luis

On 4/9/20 4:25 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> On 09.04.20 09:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Any idea why Async is not allowed in reply_route()?
>>>
> Didn't notice this question in the first place to respond in my previous
> email.
>
> Probably the developer that did it needed it for SIP requests. However,
> you can make a patch (pull request) to make it work for other cases. The
> developers will review the changes and if they don't break anything, it
> will be merged.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> .


-- 
Luis Rojas
Software Architect
Sixbell
Los Leones 1200
Providencia
Santiago, Chile
Phone: (+56-2) 22001288
mailto:luis.rojas at sixbell.com
http://www.sixbell.com




More information about the sr-users mailing list