[SR-Users] dispatch REGISTER over TLS

David Villasmil david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
Sun Nov 10 11:05:47 CET 2019


Yes you can, it’s totally doable.
But you must have one socket for unencrypted and one for encrypted. So you
need 2 “listen” one TLS and one TCP.


On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 at 02:16, sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, I was hoping there was a way to proxy from non secure (WS) to secure
> one (TLS) upstream.
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 6:12 AM David Villasmil <
> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You need to have a TLS listen like
>>
>> https://kamailio.org/docs/tls-1.3.x.html#AEN192
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 at 00:32, David Villasmil <
>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> From what you paste, 8080 is not TLS
>>>
>>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 23:29, sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kamailio listening on WS only as seen from below log snippet. As I
>>>> mentioned earlier, talks pure WS (no WSS) with the clients, and TLS towards
>>>> the SIP server.
>>>>
>>>>  0(3268) INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:74]: sctp_core_check_support():
>>>> SCTP API not enabled - if you want to use it, load sctp module
>>>> Listening on
>>>>              tcp: 10.0.0.14 [10.0.0.14]:8080
>>>> Aliases:
>>>>              *: test.example.com:*
>>>>
>>>> And here is the relevant portion from config file.
>>>> listen=tcp:10.0.0.14:8080
>>>>
>>>> With the above, I modified dispatcher.list as below
>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer, optional),
>>>> priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3 socket=tcp:10.0.0.14:8080
>>>> ;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>
>>>> With the above change, I see following in the logs
>>>>
>>>>  1(3271) WARNING: <core> [core/forward.c:228]: get_send_socket2():
>>>> protocol/port mismatch (forced tcp:10.0.0.14:8080, to tls:
>>>> 10.0.0.100:5061)
>>>>  1(3271) ERROR: tm [ut.h:315]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket
>>>> found for "10.0.0.100" af 2 (tls:10.0.0.100:5061)
>>>>  1(3271) ERROR: tm [uac.c:449]: t_uac_prepare(): no socket found
>>>>  1(3271) ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3107]: ds_ping_set(): unable to
>>>> ping [sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls]
>>>>  1(3271) WARNING: <core> [core/forward.c:228]: get_send_socket2():
>>>> protocol/port mismatch (forced tcp:10.0.0.14:8080, to tls:
>>>> 10.0.0.100:5061)
>>>>
>>>> But not attempts to connect to the SIP server.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 11:48 PM David Villasmil <
>>>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please paste the “listen” parameters from the config.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 18:04, David Villasmil <
>>>>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Is kamailio listening in that socket?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 17:34, sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks Karsten. Instead of SIP server, I ran a simple socket
>>>>>>> listener program to see if dispatcher is attempting to connect to it or
>>>>>>> not. But it did not receive any client connection attempts. So after
>>>>>>> looking at the logs, I found below log statements. Any idea why this might
>>>>>>> have happened?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  0(3004) ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:411]: pack_dest(): non-local
>>>>>>> socket <tls:10.0.0.14:5061>
>>>>>>>  0(3004) WARNING: dispatcher [dispatch.c:816]: ds_load_list():
>>>>>>> unable to add destination sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls to set
>>>>>>> 1007 -- skipping
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> dispatcher.list file pasted below contains the address. Why would
>>>>>>> this be an error?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer, optional),
>>>>>>> priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3 socket=tls:10.0.0.14:5061
>>>>>>> ;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 9:35 PM Karsten Horsmann <khorsmann at gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I guess the dispatcher is not able to get an 200 okay from your
>>>>>>>> upstream tls / sipserver. And so the dispatcher did his job. Find no active
>>>>>>>> dispatcher targets, then told you that.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You find more about the dispatcher state with kamctl dispatcher
>>>>>>>> dump or kamcmd dispatcher.list
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And read the module docu of dispatcher, they explain you the states
>>>>>>>> of the commands above.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hints here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Reading dispatcher docu, understand the states, read tls (maybe
>>>>>>>> that's your root cause).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>> Karsten
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 9. Nov. 2019, 14:56:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks David. You are right, ds_select_dst() is failing and error
>>>>>>>>> log is shown.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  9(2528) ERROR: {1 9733 REGISTER e4rvba563tlnj0i3a906qa}
>>>>>>>>> dispatcher [dispatch.c:2032]: ds_manage_routes(): no destination sets
>>>>>>>>>  9(2528) exec: {1 9733 REGISTER e4rvba563tlnj0i3a906qa} ***
>>>>>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[DISPATCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=970 a=25
>>>>>>>>> n=xdbg
>>>>>>>>>  9(2528) DEBUG: {1 9733 REGISTER e4rvba563tlnj0i3a906qa} <script>:
>>>>>>>>> --- DISPATCH: Dispatcher could not find any destination
>>>>>>>>>  9(2528) exec: {1 9733 REGISTER e4rvba563tlnj0i3a906qa} ***
>>>>>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[DISPATCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=971 a=26
>>>>>>>>> n=send_reply
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Here is the config around ds_select_dst()
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> # Dispatch requests
>>>>>>>>> route[DISPATCH] {
>>>>>>>>>         # round robin dispatching on gateways group '1'
>>>>>>>>>         if(!ds_select_dst("1007", "4")) {
>>>>>>>>>                 xdbg("--- DISPATCH: Dispatcher could not find any
>>>>>>>>> destination\n");
>>>>>>>>>                 send_reply("404", "No destination");
>>>>>>>>>                 exit;
>>>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>>>         t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH");
>>>>>>>>>         route(RELAY);
>>>>>>>>>         exit;
>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to see the logs for communication that happens
>>>>>>>>> with the destination? As you said, that also could be one of points of
>>>>>>>>> failure.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> BTW, I have set following config for pinging destination.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "list_file",
>>>>>>>>> "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list")
>>>>>>>>> #modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
>>>>>>>>>  #Use DBURL variable for database parameters
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10)          #How often
>>>>>>>>> to ping destinations to check status
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS")     #Send SIP
>>>>>>>>> Options ping
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshold", 10)      #How many
>>>>>>>>> failed pings in a row do we need before we consider it down
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_inactive_threshold", 10)     #How many
>>>>>>>>> sucessful pings in a row do we need before considering it up
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_latency_stats", 1)      #Enables
>>>>>>>>> stats on latency
>>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)            #Keeps
>>>>>>>>> pinging gateways when state is known (to detect change in state)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 6:32 PM David Villasmil <
>>>>>>>>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please post the config around the ds_select
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What that’s saying is basically it could not find a destination
>>>>>>>>>> for the set you are asking for.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Either because the setid you provide with the function doesn’t
>>>>>>>>>> exist, or the destination is not responding to the pings.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 10:33, sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Karsten. The setup consists of client connecting to
>>>>>>>>>>> kamailio over WS (10.0.0.14). Kamailio needs to proxy the requests to SIP
>>>>>>>>>>> server (10.0.0.100) over TLS. As per your suggestion, I modified the
>>>>>>>>>>> dispatch list as below
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer, optional),
>>>>>>>>>>> priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>>>>>>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3
>>>>>>>>>>> socket=tls:10.0.0.14:5061;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> With above, kamailio replies to REGISTER with "SIP/2.0 404 No
>>>>>>>>>>> destination". And in the logs, I see following statement.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1(2281) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3125]: ds_check_timer():
>>>>>>>>>>> no destination sets
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What does this mean? Is kamailio not able to talk to SIP server
>>>>>>>>>>> for some reason?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:55 PM Karsten Horsmann <
>>>>>>>>>>> khorsmann at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your config line for the dispatcher makes no sense for me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3 socket=tls:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 10.0.0.100:5061;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Means setid 1007 (like an group to arrange multiple targets)
>>>>>>>>>>>> okay.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls is the dispatcher target
>>>>>>>>>>>> Uri. Where your calls are placed when you call the dispatcher function with
>>>>>>>>>>>> setid 1007.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> In combination with socket=10.0.0.100:5061 (that indicates
>>>>>>>>>>>> your Kamailio socket, the proxy ip)
>>>>>>>>>>>> That you talking with yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You should read the module documentations for dispatcher and
>>>>>>>>>>>> tls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Or describe your ip setup and your config a bit more.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>> Karsten
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 17:41:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karsten, David,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your pointers. Earlier I was using mysql backend
>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the dispatch list was stored. Now following your suggestions, I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>> switched to dispatcher list in a file (/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list) and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> put in the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional), priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>> socket=tls:10.0.0.100:5061;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even with this, when HTTP request in, the same is upgraded to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> WS connection. But this gets closed after couple of seconds. Does the below
>>>>>>>>>>>>> log indicate anything?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9(1784) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[xhttp:request]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1112 a=2 n=exit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  9(1784) DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:636]:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to understand what's happening? I do not see
>>>>>>>>>>>>> any other error lin logs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:34 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06.11.19 20:46, Karsten Horsmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the sips Uri schemata is not used for tls with dispatcher.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jumping in to clarify a bit about sips protocol schema. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't imply TLS as one may think HTTPS does it for HTTP. The sips is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mandating that the traffic goes over secure links, which can be IPSec/VPN
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or even just private network, so it is ok using UDP or TCP when sips is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In SIP, if TLS is wanted, then transport=tls has to be added
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the URI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for dispatcher, one more clarification: trasport=tls in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attrs has nothing to do with the destination address, so that has to be in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the value of the destination field, as Karsten gave in his example.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And, as general note: better do not use sips at all, it can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mess up some nodes in the path, if you are not sure about the need of sips
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- just do uri;trasport=tls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here an example for flatfile dispatcher.list (need corrected
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> values).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The socket line must match an listen directive in your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio.cfg.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root at sbc1:~# cat /etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional), priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1007 sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls 0 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> socket=tls:212.xx.xx.xx:5061;ping_from=sip:sbc-d01.yourdomain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karsten
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20:32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a basic setup where kamailio receives SIP over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> websocket (no WSS) and forwards to SIP server over TLS. I have enabled TLS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in kamailio.cfg and added dispatcher node as sips:SIP_SERVER:5061 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transport=tls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +----+-------+------------------------+-------+----------+---------------+----------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | id | setid | destination            | flags | priority |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attrs         | description    |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +----+-------+------------------------+-------+----------+---------------+----------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |  4 |     1 | sips:10.0.0.100:5061 |     0 |        0 |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transport=tls | SIP SERVER |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +----+-------+------------------------+-------+----------+---------------+----------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when REGISTER is received over websocket, kamailio is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responding with error code 500 and phrase "500 I'm terribly sorry, server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error occurred (7/SL)". And on the console I see the following error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <core> [core/md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5 calculated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f1ecf7bcb659b07fe81e332e100044e5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) ERROR: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ut.h:315]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "10.0.0.100" af 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (tls:10.0.0.100:5061)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) ERROR: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [t_fwd.c:467]: prepare_new_uac(): can't fwd to af 2, proto 3  (no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding listening socket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) ERROR: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [t_fwd.c:1735]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [t_funcs.c:334]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -7 (-7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [t_funcs.c:352]: t_relay_to(): -7 error reply generation delayed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) exec: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} ***
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=587 a=24
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> n=sl_reply_error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <core> [core/msg_translator.c:162]: check_via_address(): (10.0.0.14,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hsvmphm3ps12.invalid, 0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> websocket [ws_conn.c:452]: wsconn_get(): wsconn_get for id [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *tls.cfg contents*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [client:default]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method = TLSv1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verify_certificate = yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require_certificate = yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private_key = /home/test/kamailio/internal.key
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate = /home/test/kamailio/internal.crt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ca_list = /home/test/kamailio/ca_list.pem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any reason why this error is seen? Any inputs appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users at lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> David Villasmil
>>>>>>>>>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> phone: +34669448337
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> David Villasmil
>>>>>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>>>>> phone: +34669448337
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> David Villasmil
>>>>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>>>> phone: +34669448337
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> David Villasmil
>>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>> phone: +34669448337
>>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> David Villasmil
>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>> phone: +34669448337
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-- 
Regards,

David Villasmil
email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
phone: +34669448337
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20191110/0d38b7e8/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list