[SR-Users] dispatch REGISTER over TLS

sthustfo sthustfo at gmail.com
Sun Nov 10 03:10:43 CET 2019


Well, I was hoping there was a way to proxy from non secure (WS) to secure
one (TLS) upstream.


On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 6:12 AM David Villasmil <
david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:

> You need to have a TLS listen like
>
> https://kamailio.org/docs/tls-1.3.x.html#AEN192
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Nov 2019 at 00:32, David Villasmil <
> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> From what you paste, 8080 is not TLS
>>
>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 23:29, sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Kamailio listening on WS only as seen from below log snippet. As I
>>> mentioned earlier, talks pure WS (no WSS) with the clients, and TLS towards
>>> the SIP server.
>>>
>>>  0(3268) INFO: <core> [core/sctp_core.c:74]: sctp_core_check_support():
>>> SCTP API not enabled - if you want to use it, load sctp module
>>> Listening on
>>>              tcp: 10.0.0.14 [10.0.0.14]:8080
>>> Aliases:
>>>              *: test.example.com:*
>>>
>>> And here is the relevant portion from config file.
>>> listen=tcp:10.0.0.14:8080
>>>
>>> With the above, I modified dispatcher.list as below
>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer, optional),
>>> priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3 socket=tcp:10.0.0.14:8080
>>> ;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>
>>> With the above change, I see following in the logs
>>>
>>>  1(3271) WARNING: <core> [core/forward.c:228]: get_send_socket2():
>>> protocol/port mismatch (forced tcp:10.0.0.14:8080, to tls:
>>> 10.0.0.100:5061)
>>>  1(3271) ERROR: tm [ut.h:315]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found
>>> for "10.0.0.100" af 2 (tls:10.0.0.100:5061)
>>>  1(3271) ERROR: tm [uac.c:449]: t_uac_prepare(): no socket found
>>>  1(3271) ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3107]: ds_ping_set(): unable to
>>> ping [sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls]
>>>  1(3271) WARNING: <core> [core/forward.c:228]: get_send_socket2():
>>> protocol/port mismatch (forced tcp:10.0.0.14:8080, to tls:
>>> 10.0.0.100:5061)
>>>
>>> But not attempts to connect to the SIP server.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 11:48 PM David Villasmil <
>>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please paste the “listen” parameters from the config.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 18:04, David Villasmil <
>>>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Is kamailio listening in that socket?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 17:34, sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Karsten. Instead of SIP server, I ran a simple socket listener
>>>>>> program to see if dispatcher is attempting to connect to it or not. But it
>>>>>> did not receive any client connection attempts. So after looking at the
>>>>>> logs, I found below log statements. Any idea why this might have happened?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  0(3004) ERROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:411]: pack_dest(): non-local
>>>>>> socket <tls:10.0.0.14:5061>
>>>>>>  0(3004) WARNING: dispatcher [dispatch.c:816]: ds_load_list(): unable
>>>>>> to add destination sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls to set 1007 --
>>>>>> skipping
>>>>>>
>>>>>> dispatcher.list file pasted below contains the address. Why would
>>>>>> this be an error?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer, optional),
>>>>>> priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3 socket=tls:10.0.0.14:5061;
>>>>>> ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 9:35 PM Karsten Horsmann <khorsmann at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I guess the dispatcher is not able to get an 200 okay from your
>>>>>>> upstream tls / sipserver. And so the dispatcher did his job. Find no active
>>>>>>> dispatcher targets, then told you that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You find more about the dispatcher state with kamctl dispatcher dump
>>>>>>> or kamcmd dispatcher.list
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And read the module docu of dispatcher, they explain you the states
>>>>>>> of the commands above.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hints here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Reading dispatcher docu, understand the states, read tls (maybe
>>>>>>> that's your root cause).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Karsten
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> schrieb am Sa., 9. Nov. 2019, 14:56:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks David. You are right, ds_select_dst() is failing and error
>>>>>>>> log is shown.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  9(2528) ERROR: {1 9733 REGISTER e4rvba563tlnj0i3a906qa} dispatcher
>>>>>>>> [dispatch.c:2032]: ds_manage_routes(): no destination sets
>>>>>>>>  9(2528) exec: {1 9733 REGISTER e4rvba563tlnj0i3a906qa} ***
>>>>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[DISPATCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=970 a=25
>>>>>>>> n=xdbg
>>>>>>>>  9(2528) DEBUG: {1 9733 REGISTER e4rvba563tlnj0i3a906qa} <script>:
>>>>>>>> --- DISPATCH: Dispatcher could not find any destination
>>>>>>>>  9(2528) exec: {1 9733 REGISTER e4rvba563tlnj0i3a906qa} ***
>>>>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[DISPATCH] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=971 a=26
>>>>>>>> n=send_reply
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the config around ds_select_dst()
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> # Dispatch requests
>>>>>>>> route[DISPATCH] {
>>>>>>>>         # round robin dispatching on gateways group '1'
>>>>>>>>         if(!ds_select_dst("1007", "4")) {
>>>>>>>>                 xdbg("--- DISPATCH: Dispatcher could not find any
>>>>>>>> destination\n");
>>>>>>>>                 send_reply("404", "No destination");
>>>>>>>>                 exit;
>>>>>>>>         }
>>>>>>>>         t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH");
>>>>>>>>         route(RELAY);
>>>>>>>>         exit;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Is there any way to see the logs for communication that happens
>>>>>>>> with the destination? As you said, that also could be one of points of
>>>>>>>> failure.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW, I have set following config for pinging destination.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "list_file", "/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list")
>>>>>>>> #modparam("dispatcher", "db_url", DBURL)
>>>>>>>>  #Use DBURL variable for database parameters
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10)          #How often
>>>>>>>> to ping destinations to check status
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_method", "OPTIONS")     #Send SIP
>>>>>>>> Options ping
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshold", 10)      #How many
>>>>>>>> failed pings in a row do we need before we consider it down
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_inactive_threshold", 10)     #How many
>>>>>>>> sucessful pings in a row do we need before considering it up
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_latency_stats", 1)      #Enables
>>>>>>>> stats on latency
>>>>>>>> modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 1)            #Keeps
>>>>>>>> pinging gateways when state is known (to detect change in state)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best Regards.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 6:32 PM David Villasmil <
>>>>>>>> david.villasmil.work at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please post the config around the ds_select
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What that’s saying is basically it could not find a destination
>>>>>>>>> for the set you are asking for.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Either because the setid you provide with the function doesn’t
>>>>>>>>> exist, or the destination is not responding to the pings.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 9 Nov 2019 at 10:33, sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Karsten. The setup consists of client connecting to
>>>>>>>>>> kamailio over WS (10.0.0.14). Kamailio needs to proxy the requests to SIP
>>>>>>>>>> server (10.0.0.100) over TLS. As per your suggestion, I modified the
>>>>>>>>>> dispatch list as below
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer, optional),
>>>>>>>>>> priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>>>>>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3
>>>>>>>>>> socket=tls:10.0.0.14:5061;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> With above, kamailio replies to REGISTER with "SIP/2.0 404 No
>>>>>>>>>> destination". And in the logs, I see following statement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1(2281) DEBUG: dispatcher [dispatch.c:3125]: ds_check_timer(): no
>>>>>>>>>> destination sets
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> What does this mean? Is kamailio not able to talk to SIP server
>>>>>>>>>> for some reason?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 11:55 PM Karsten Horsmann <
>>>>>>>>>> khorsmann at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Your config line for the dispatcher makes no sense for me.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3 socket=tls:
>>>>>>>>>>> 10.0.0.100:5061;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Means setid 1007 (like an group to arrange multiple targets)
>>>>>>>>>>> okay.
>>>>>>>>>>> But sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls is the dispatcher target
>>>>>>>>>>> Uri. Where your calls are placed when you call the dispatcher function with
>>>>>>>>>>> setid 1007.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In combination with socket=10.0.0.100:5061 (that indicates your
>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio socket, the proxy ip)
>>>>>>>>>>> That you talking with yourself.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You should read the module documentations for dispatcher and
>>>>>>>>>>> tls.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Or describe your ip setup and your config a bit more.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>> Karsten
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> schrieb am Fr., 8. Nov. 2019,
>>>>>>>>>>> 17:41:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Karsten, David,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your pointers. Earlier I was using mysql backend
>>>>>>>>>>>> where the dispatch list was stored. Now following your suggestions, I have
>>>>>>>>>>>> switched to dispatcher list in a file (/etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list) and
>>>>>>>>>>>> put in the following
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer,
>>>>>>>>>>>> optional), priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1007 sip:10.0.0.100:5061;transport=tls 0 3
>>>>>>>>>>>> socket=tls:10.0.0.100:5061;ping_from=sip:10.0.0.14
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Even with this, when HTTP request in, the same is upgraded to
>>>>>>>>>>>> WS connection. But this gets closed after couple of seconds. Does the below
>>>>>>>>>>>> log indicate anything?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 9(1784) exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[xhttp:request]
>>>>>>>>>>>> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1112 a=2 n=exit
>>>>>>>>>>>>  9(1784) DEBUG: <core> [core/usr_avp.c:636]:
>>>>>>>>>>>> destroy_avp_list(): destroying list (nil)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is there any way to understand what's happening? I do not see
>>>>>>>>>>>> any other error lin logs.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 2:34 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>>>>>>>>>>>> miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 06.11.19 20:46, Karsten Horsmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the sips Uri schemata is not used for tls with dispatcher.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jumping in to clarify a bit about sips protocol schema. It
>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't imply TLS as one may think HTTPS does it for HTTP. The sips is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mandating that the traffic goes over secure links, which can be IPSec/VPN
>>>>>>>>>>>>> or even just private network, so it is ok using UDP or TCP when sips is
>>>>>>>>>>>>> present.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In SIP, if TLS is wanted, then transport=tls has to be added
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the URI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for dispatcher, one more clarification: trasport=tls in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> attrs has nothing to do with the destination address, so that has to be in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the value of the destination field, as Karsten gave in his example.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> And, as general note: better do not use sips at all, it can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mess up some nodes in the path, if you are not sure about the need of sips
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- just do uri;trasport=tls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here an example for flatfile dispatcher.list (need corrected
>>>>>>>>>>>>> values).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The socket line must match an listen directive in your
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio.cfg.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> root at sbc1:~# cat /etc/kamailio/dispatcher.list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> # setid(integer) destination(sip uri) flags (integer,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> optional), priority(int,opt), attrs (str,optional)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1007 sip:sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com;transport=tls 0 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>> socket=tls:212.xx.xx.xx:5061;ping_from=sip:sbc-d01.yourdomain
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Karsten
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sthustfo <sthustfo at gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 6. Nov. 2019,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20:32:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have a basic setup where kamailio receives SIP over
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> websocket (no WSS) and forwards to SIP server over TLS. I have enabled TLS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in kamailio.cfg and added dispatcher node as sips:SIP_SERVER:5061 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transport=tls.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +----+-------+------------------------+-------+----------+---------------+----------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | id | setid | destination            | flags | priority |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attrs         | description    |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +----+-------+------------------------+-------+----------+---------------+----------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |  4 |     1 | sips:10.0.0.100:5061 |     0 |        0 |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> transport=tls | SIP SERVER |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +----+-------+------------------------+-------+----------+---------------+----------------+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now when REGISTER is received over websocket, kamailio is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> responding with error code 500 and phrase "500 I'm terribly sorry, server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> error occurred (7/SL)". And on the console I see the following error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <core> [core/md5utils.c:67]: MD5StringArray(): MD5 calculated:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> f1ecf7bcb659b07fe81e332e100044e5
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) ERROR: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ut.h:315]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "10.0.0.100" af 2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (tls:10.0.0.100:5061)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) ERROR: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [t_fwd.c:467]: prepare_new_uac(): can't fwd to af 2, proto 3  (no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding listening socket)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) ERROR: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [t_fwd.c:1735]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [t_funcs.c:334]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned error -7 (-7)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} tm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [t_funcs.c:352]: t_relay_to(): -7 error reply generation delayed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) exec: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv} ***
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY] c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=587 a=24
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> n=sl_reply_error
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <core> [core/msg_translator.c:162]: check_via_address(): (10.0.0.14,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hsvmphm3ps12.invalid, 0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12(33858) DEBUG: {1 2521 REGISTER o9q7ujqgin33qgp00abijv}
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> websocket [ws_conn.c:452]: wsconn_get(): wsconn_get for id [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *tls.cfg contents*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [client:default]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> method = TLSv1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verify_certificate = yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> require_certificate = yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> private_key = /home/test/kamailio/internal.key
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> certificate = /home/test/kamailio/internal.crt
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ca_list = /home/test/kamailio/ca_list.pem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any reason why this error is seen? Any inputs appreciated.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users at lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> David Villasmil
>>>>>>>>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> phone: +34669448337
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>> David Villasmil
>>>>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>>>> phone: +34669448337
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> David Villasmil
>>>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>>>> phone: +34669448337
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> David Villasmil
>> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
>> phone: +34669448337
>>
> --
> Regards,
>
> David Villasmil
> email: david.villasmil.work at gmail.com
> phone: +34669448337
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20191110/30afe3fd/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list