[SR-Users] Possible memory leak in siptrace module in kamailio 5.1/5.2

[davy van de moere]

Actually so far it seems using
KSR.siptrace.sip_trace("sip:<myhomerip>:9060") instead of
KSR.siptrace.sip_trace_dst("sip:<myhomerip>:9060"), fixes it ! I'm rolling
it out on more systems to be sure, and wait a bit longer to be very sure.
But thx for the help!

Op di 14 mei 2019 om 09:28 schreef Thomas Weber <thomas.weber at pascom.net>:

> Hi Davy,
>
> we're using siptrace with kemi and python 2. I can not confirm your
> problem on kamailio 5.2.2.
>
> In difference to your script, however, i'm not setting a target address in
> the invocation.
> Instead the cfg script sets modparam("siptrace", "duplicate_uri",
> "sip:<myhomerip>:9060") and uses KSR.siptrace.sip_trace()
>
> Maybe it makes a difference, can you try it out?
>
> Regards,
>
> Thomas
>
>
> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> > Von: "davy van de moere" <davy.van.de.moere at gmail.com>
> > An: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List" <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2019 07:57:05
> > Betreff: [SR-Users] Possible memory leak in siptrace module in kamailio
>      5.1/5.2
>
> > Dear,
> >
> > I'm using siptrace within a python handler in the KEMI framework.
> > KSR.siptrace.sip_trace_dst("sip:<myhomerip>:9060")
> >
> > I notice an ever increasing usage of memory, until the system runs out of
> > memory. (definition of a memory leak :) ). Looking at the memory
> information
> > kamailio is giving me I notice this:
> >
> > May 14 05:49:48 server kamailio[36452]: NOTICE: PYT {INVITE}
> > {1769595029-1513210001-1955500877} {1} : qm_sums: count= 79286 size=
> 5812048
> > bytes from siptrace: siptrace.c: ki_sip_trace_dst_cid(729)
> > May 14 05:51:17 server kamailio[36452]: NOTICE: PYT {REGISTER} { [
> > mailto:4_1419955802 at 192.168.0.153 | 4_1419955802 at 192.168.0.153 ] }
> {2582} :
> > qm_sums: count= 79335 size= 5814840 bytes from siptrace: siptrace.c:
> > ki_sip_trace_dst_cid(729)
> >
> > I notice this on kamailio 5.1.8 (from a debian repo), and on kamailio
> 5.2.2
> > (from source). I can reproduce the problem very easily, and I can apply
> patches
> > in the source to try out things.
> >
> > Could I be wrongly using siptrace? Can I give you more debugging info?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Davy
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> > sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20190515/4b91b09e/attachment.html>