[SR-Users] CRITICAL ERROR in data_lamp.c!

Mojtaba mespio at gmail.com
Tue Jun 11 14:44:39 CEST 2019


I assigned a const sdp string to it just for checking. Does it matter to
allocate new memory for newbody?

On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 15:22 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> how do you set newbody.s and newbody.len?
>
> Daniel
>
> On 11.06.19 12:29, Mojtaba wrote:
> > Not yet, because it is under developing, i could paste it here right
> away.
> >
> > {
> >  .
> >  .
> >  .
> >     body.s = get_body(msg);
> >     if (body.s == 0) {
> >                 LM_ERR("failed to get the message body\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> >     body.len = msg->len - (int) (body.s - msg->buf);
> > //    body.len = strlen(body.s);
> >     if (body.len == 0) {
> >                 LM_DBG("message body has zero length\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> >     l = del_lump(msg, body.s - msg->buf, body.len, 0);
> >     if (!l) {
> >                 LM_ERR("del_lump failed\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> >
> >     if (!insert_new_lump_after(l, newbody.s, newbody.len, 0)) {
> >                 LM_ERR("insert_new_lump_after failed\n");
> >         return -1;
> >     }
> > }
> > I asked related issue in this regards in Kamailio developer forum,
> > before. let me paste it at below. The means of other_process function
> > is above code.
> > In during developing new module in Kamailio, I encountered with
> > strange behaviour. I used htable module instead of linked list for
> > save some temporary data during call process.dependencies module to
> > save some information. the skeleton of my code is like thus:
> >
> > if (SIP_REQUEST &METHOD_INVITE) {
> >           insert_data_htable("some data");
> >           other_process(msg);
> > }else if(SIP_REPLY){
> >          get_data_htable("some data");
> >          other_process(msg);
> > }
> > In other_process function i have some changes in msg's body with message
> lump.
> > But after i make first call in kamailio. The kamailio was crashed.What
> > is it's problem?
> > In additional if i comment either insert/get_data_htable function or
> > othet_process function, i dont have this issue.
> > With best regards.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 2:46 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> > <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> likely you didn't allocate the pointer inserted in data lump list. Is
> >> the code using data lumps available to look at on git?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On 11.06.19 12:01, Mojtaba wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> What does this CRITICAL error mean?
> >>> Jun 11 05:48:13 debian8 /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[8468]: {1 1 INVITE
> >>> Njg0MzNhMzJhOTY3MzQ3NmNlNWY0ODkzMTJmNTM1ZTk.} CRITICAL: <core>
> >>> [core/mem/q_malloc.c:486]: qm_free(): BUG: bad pointer 0xa3c188 (out
> >>> of memory block!) called from core: core/data_lump.c: free_lump(466) -
> >>> aborting
> >>>
> >>> I got it when i make new call during debugging new module in Kamailio?
> >>> In module we have to change some message's body with data_lump.
> >>> I asked relaed issue (strange behaviour while developing new module)
> >>> in Kamailio developer forum <sr-dev at lists.kamailio.org>
> >>> With Best Regards.
> >>>
> >> --
> >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> >> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> >>
> >
> > --
> > --Mojtaba Esfandiari.S
>
> --
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20190611/3f6b74b7/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list