[SR-Users] How to statelessly send a reply to custom destination?
Karsten Horsmann
khorsmann at gmail.com
Fri Jul 5 08:36:48 CEST 2019
Hi George,
i use something like that (shameless stolen from other configuration files
within request-route).
Thats for answering options to my internal kamailio.
But Alex Balashov wrote an nice blog poste about NAT/OPTION Pings
with kamailio:
http://www.evaristesys.com/blog/server-side-nat-traversal-with-kamailio-the-definitive-guide/
### only initial requests (no To tag)
if (is_method("OPTIONS"))
{
if (uri=~"sip:.*[@]+.*") {
sl_send_reply("501", "Not Implemented");
}
else {
options_reply();
exit;
}
}
Cheers Karsten
Am Do., 4. Juli 2019 um 10:29 Uhr schrieb George Diamantopoulos <
georgediam at gmail.com>:
> Hello all,
>
> I've been trying to handle OPTIONS statelessly, but proper handling fails
> for UACs behind NAT without ALG. I thought I'd overcome this by setting the
> $du pseudovariable, but apparently I'm missing something. The following
> does not work:
>
> if ($Rp == "6050") {
> force_send_socket(udp:10.10.10.10:6050);
> }
> $du = "sip:" + $si + ":" + $sp;
> sl_send_reply("200","OK");
> exit;
>
> I'm now realising that I put this in request_route() so
> force_send_socket() and $du have no use whatsoever, since the request is
> not forwarded anywhere. Is this the reason?
>
> So the question is, how can I do the following things for a stateless
> reply: a) choose a sending socket for the reply and b) change the
> destination for the reply to something other than the URI in the first Via
> header.
>
> Thanks!
>
> BR,
> George
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
*Karsten Horsmann*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20190705/2b149ec0/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list