[SR-Users] [sr-dev] Failed to catch some reply message with reply_route block
Salah Ahmed
txrubel at gmail.com
Sun Aug 25 18:01:58 CEST 2019
Hello Daniel,
Thanks for your reply. We want this not to modify the reply message, we
just want to invoke sip_trace from onsend_route. Actually we want to trace
all sip messages in between Kamailio and UAC. Right now we can easily grab
all requests using onsend_route. We also set the core parameter
onsend_route_reply
= yes ,This started capturing replies, but those are UAS to Kamailio side
replies. For debug I added xlog in the onsend_route and print the reply
messages. I am not sure, is that sip_trace method issue or the onsend_route
issue. Please guide me is there anything else I can do for it.
Thanks,
Salah
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 2:29 PM Salah Ahmed <txrubel at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Henning,
>
> Is there anything wrong what we want to do?
>
> Thanks,
> Salah
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:56 PM Salah Ahmed <txrubel at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Henning,
>>
>> Yes this is correct, this reply came from UAS. We got this correctly. But
>> we want to get, which kamailio sent to UAC side.
>>
>> This following reply, we want to get by onreply_route
>>
>> 3(23) DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2306]:
>> generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): copied size: orig:130, new: 16, rest: 773
>> msg=
>> SIP/2.0 200 OK
>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 172.32.100.100:5055;branch=z9hG4bK-254-1-0
>> Record-Route: <sip:172.32.0.6:5060;lr;ftag=1>
>> Call-ID: T1_MYSER
>> From: <sip:caller at 172.32.100.100>;tag=1
>> To: "callee" <sip:3228090000 at 172.32.0.6
>> >;tag=6fb31703-d630-4140-a41b-7270cdcae85b
>> CSeq: 1 INVITE
>> Server: MYX Callcontrol
>> Contact: <sip:172.32.10.70:5060>
>> Allow: OPTIONS, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, PUBLISH, INVITE, ACK, BYE, CANCEL,
>> UPDATE, REGISTER, MESSAGE, REFER
>> Supported: timer, replaces, norefersub
>> Remote-Party-ID: <sip:s at 172.32.0.6>;privacy=off;screen=no
>> Content-Type: application/sdp
>> Content-Length: 178
>>
>> v=0
>> o=- 53655765 2353687639 IN IP4 172.32.10.70
>> s=session
>> c=IN IP4 172.32.10.70
>> t=0 0
>> m=audio 10006 RTP/AVP 0
>> a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
>> a=ptime:20
>> a=maxptime:150
>> a=sendrecv
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Salah
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:52 PM Henning Westerholt <hw at skalatan.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> (moved the discussion to user list)
>>>
>>> Hello Salah,
>>>
>>> I see the this output in the log message:
>>>
>>> 6(26) INFO: <script>: on_reply_route [SIP/2.0 200 OK
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>> 172.32.0.6;rport=5060;received=172.32.0.6;branch=z9hG4bKe68a.99dc492fe74dcfe1017828521a5fa362.0
>>>
>>> 2(22) INFO: <script>: on_reply_route [SIP/2.0 100 Trying
>>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
>>> 172.32.0.6;rport=5060;received=172.32.0.6;branch=z9hG4bK178a.79cddb135aabfc42736fd9e9fd826ba8.0
>>>
>>> and so on.. So you are seeing the replies correctly, or I wrong?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Henning
>>> Am 22.08.19 um 21:29 schrieb Salah Ahmed:
>>>
>>> Hello Henning,
>>>
>>> We already added xlog in the onreply_route and found all messages in
>>> between kamailio and UAS. The attached log files in first email has those
>>> logs. If any other specific log needed I am here to provide them.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Salah
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:24 PM Henning Westerholt <hw at skalatan.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello Salah,
>>>>
>>>> ok, see if you are able to output some easy log with "xlog" in this
>>>> route, to make sure there is no cfg problem somewhere.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Henning
>>>> Am 22.08.19 um 21:15 schrieb Salah Ahmed:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Henning,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for quick reply, We armed the t_on_reply just before t_relay()
>>>> in the route block.
>>>>
>>>> t_on_reply("LOGRPL");
>>>> if (!t_relay()) {
>>>> sl_reply_error();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Salah
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 2:03 PM Henning Westerholt <hw at skalatan.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Salah,
>>>>>
>>>>> the replies are going from the UAS to the UAC over Kamailo as a proxy,
>>>>> with the exception of the hop-by-hop 100.
>>>>>
>>>>> So you should see the 200 OK in the Kamailio in reply_route and
>>>>> onreply_route. Maybe you can check if you armed the onreply_route with
>>>>> t_on_reply for the INVITE routing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Henning
>>>>> Am 22.08.19 um 19:50 schrieb Salah Ahmed:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> We facing an issue on capturing sip message in Kamailio(Version:
>>>>> 5.2.3). The scenario is very simple.
>>>>>
>>>>> UAC Kamailio UAS
>>>>> |--------INVITE--------->| |
>>>>> | |-------INVITE------->|
>>>>> | |<------100 Trying----|
>>>>> |<-------100 Trying------| |
>>>>> | |<------200 Ok--------|
>>>>> |<-------200 Ok----------| |
>>>>>
>>>>> In this simple scenario, we can't catch any reply messages in between
>>>>> the Kamailio and UAC. We have tried reply_route, onreply_route,
>>>>> and onsend_route. But no one work to grep that reply on that side.
>>>>> onsend_route was bad try as its only for forwarded reply message. Is there
>>>>> any other magic to capture those replies. A debug=3 log message attached
>>>>> here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Salah
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Development Mailing Listsr-dev at lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
>>>>> Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>> Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
>>>> Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services
>>>>
>>>> --
>>> Henning Westerholt - https://skalatan.de/blog/
>>> Kamailio services - https://skalatan.de/services
>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20190825/1cb56d43/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list