[SR-Users] Upstream ignores reply, because To-tag doesn't match?
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Mon Apr 8 08:15:40 CEST 2019
On 07.04.19 15:40, Sergiu Pojoga wrote:
> To simplify, the problem seems to come down to the following: how do
> you cancel/end an early state dialog between the caller and callee
> after `fr_inv_timeout` occurs? Kam self-generates a proper CANCEL
> towards the callee, while the caller gets a `408 Request Timeout' with
> a different To-tag.
That's all required not to have a dialog completed, but faild. There is
no need to send a BYE or another CANCEL. The INVITE got the 408, not 200.
Cheers,
Daniel
>
> I've tried:
> dlg_bye("all") - throws an error, non-confirmed dialogs can't be
> terminated with this function
> t_cancel_callid("$dlg(callid)", "$dlg(from_cseq)", "22", "200") -
> doesn't seem to produce any action
>
> Suggestions?
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 11:25 AM Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas at gmail.com
> <mailto:pojogas at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi ppl,
>
> Scenario: invite from upstream is t_relayed to a client gateway.
> After `fr_inv_timeout` occurs, in a failure route I simply t_reply
> with "503 - Service unavailable", then exit().
>
> However, the upstream provider simply ignores this reply, call
> doesn't hang up. This doesn't happen when the client's gateway
> generates identical 503 or other negative replies.
>
> I suspect this is happening because the To-tag in the Kam
> generated 503 reply doesn't match with the To-tag that previously
> was forwarded from the client's gateway to the upstream provider
> in the `180 Ringing`.
>
> Any suggestions what can be done about it?
>
>
> 2019/04/06 10:42:46.127177 65.39.xxx.xxx:5060 ->
> 208.72.xxx.xxx:5060
>
>
> SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>
>
>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 208.72.xxx.xxx:5060;received=208.72.xxx.xxx;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1982422573
>
>
> Record-Route: <sip:65.39.xxx.xxx;lr=on;did=915.8af1>
>
>
>
> From: "SERGIU"
> <sip:514XXXXXXX at 208.72.xxx.xxx>;isup-oli=00;tag=1975755942
>
>
> To: <sip:514XXXXXXX at 65.39.xxx.xxx>;tag=as2ab54180
>
>
>
> Call-ID: DID-28270826 at 208.72.xxx.xx
>
>
>
> CSeq: 477023 INVITE
>
>
>
> Supported: replaces, timer, path
>
>
>
> Contact: <sip:1514XXXXXXX at 65.39.xxx.xxx:5060>
>
>
>
> Content-Length: 0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2019/04/06 10:42:51.072516 65.39.xxx.xxx:5060 ->
> 208.72.xxx.xxx:5060
>
>
> SIP/2.0 503 Service Unavailable
>
>
>
> Call-ID: DID-28270826 at 208.72.xxx.xx
>
>
>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 208.72.xxx.xxx:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1982422573;received=208.72.xxx.xxx
>
>
> From: "SERGIU"
> <sip:514XXXXXXX at 208.72.xxx.xxx>;isup-oli=00;tag=1975755942
>
>
> To:
> <sip:514XXXXXXX at 65.39.xxx.xxx>;tag=a6a1c5f60faecf035a1ae5b6e96e979a-8e82
>
>
> CSeq: 477023 INVITE
>
>
>
> Server: KAM
>
>
>
> Content-Length: 0
>
> Thanks,
> --Sergiu
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20190408/6a4c4c9b/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list