[SR-Users] in-dialog requests

[Ali Taher]

Hi Alex,

How can I troubleshoot the issue in this case ?

Noting that I'm using Kamailio 4.2.0

Thanks
Ali Taher

-----Original Message-----
From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Alex Balashov
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 4:50 PM
To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] in-dialog requests

That may be, but it's still the correct config to use. Your scaled-down version simply will not work.

On July 18, 2018 9:47:15 AM EDT, Ali Taher <ataher at vanrise.com> wrote:
>Hi Alex,
>
>Yes I did, but I noticed that all in-dialog requests sent by freeswitch 
>to kamailio were ignored and no packet was generated from kamailio in 
>this regard.
>
>I'm not sure if t_relay is working as expected at my side.
>
>Thanks.
>Ali Taher
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> On Behalf Of Alex 
>Balashov
>Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 4:34 PM
>To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>Subject: Re: [SR-Users] in-dialog requests
>
>Have you tried the config I suggested to you yesterday?
>
>On July 18, 2018 9:32:01 AM EDT, Ali Taher <ataher at vanrise.com> wrote:
>>Hello,
>>
>> 
>>
>>I'm using Kamailio as a proxy behind freeswitch to alter some packets
>>(183
>>packets precisely).
>>
>> 
>>
>>Here is my scenario:
>>
>> 
>>
>>(---Customer---) --> ((port 5065)---Kamailio---) -->
>>((port5060)---Freeswitch---) --> (---Supplier---)
>>
>> 
>>
>>Here is my request route :
>>
>> 
>>
>>route{
>>
>> 
>>
>>if (is_method("INVITE")) {
>>
>>        xlog("L_INFO","INSIDE request route $si \n");
>>
>>          insert_hf("X-AUTH-IP: $si\r\n");
>>
>>}
>>
>> 
>>
>>route(FWD);
>>
>>}
>>
>> 
>>
>> 
>>
>>reply_route {
>>
>>#xlog("L_INFO","INSDE reply \n");
>>
>>    if (status == "183") {
>>
>>        change_reply_status(180, "Ringing");
>>
>>        exit;
>>
>>    }
>>
>>}
>>
>> 
>>
>>route[FWD] {
>>
>>#xlog("L_INFO","INSIDE FWD \n");
>>
>>forward(X.X.X.X,5060);
>>
>>}
>>
>>Where X.X.X.X is the Freeswitch IP
>>
>> 
>>
>>This script is working normally as long as the customer is sending the
>>requests(INVITE,BYE,ACK,CANCEL..) . But when the supplier or
>freeswitch
>>initiated the request , above script causes loop where the packet is 
>>bounced between kamailio and freeswitch.
>>
>> 
>>
>>As I know , loose_route is used to handle such requests , but I'm not 
>>sure how to forward these packets to the customer after receiving them
>
>>from freeswitch.
>>
>> 
>>
>>I'm not sure also if what's I'm doing is statefull or stateless.
>>
>> 
>>
>>Any help is appreciated.
>>
>> 
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Ali Taher
>
>
>-- Alex
>
>--
>Sent via mobile, please forgive typos and brevity. 
>
>_______________________________________________
>Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


-- Alex

--
Sent via mobile, please forgive typos and brevity. 

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users