[SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

[Yuriy Gorlichenko]

Thx Alex
Finally I clarified question for myself
UAC not ignores Route in case of direct connection to provider
It sends to needed ip:port on the transport:network layers

So provider wrong in case that avaits ACK at the different port than Route.

THx all .For now all clear.


2018-07-02 11:24 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook at gmail.com>:

> Jut in update
> In kamailio case all goes well
> Kamailio sets to UAC Record-Route in the 200 reply and then UAC sends ACK
> via Route sent...
>
> I totally confised...
> In both examples from my provider 200 contains Route set but in case of
> kamailio UAC uses route and in case of provider it uses Contact...
>
> both Route heanders contains "lr"
>
> Provider based Route header jsut contains only *sip:ip:port;lr *when my
> testing kamaili regitrar contains
> *sip:ip:port;lr,ftag=fromtaghere*
>
>
>
> 2018-07-02 10:45 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook at gmail.com>:
>
>> Anyway thank you so much for your responses
>> I really appreciate your time and your help here
>>
>> 2018-07-02 10:42 GMT+03:00 Yuriy Gorlichenko <ovoshlook at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Yep this clear for me from the start.
>>>
>>> For me for now not clear question  abot direct connect for now.
>>>
>>> 2018-07-02 10:00 GMT+03:00 Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com>:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 09:59:12AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > That was my point also...
>>>> > But they sent me lint to rfc3261 12.1.2 and that confused me
>>>> >
>>>> > So just for resume:
>>>> >
>>>> > So am I right if I say that in case If provider receives INVITE with
>>>> > Record-Route from my side (myProxy)
>>>> > Provider should care about it's own Record-Route and it should have
>>>> uri
>>>> > where myProxy should sent ACK to instead of using Contact in thi case
>>>> >
>>>> > In case direct conntect UAC -> Provider I still need to use Contact
>>>> field
>>>> > as URI to send ACK to that explained on the 12.1.2 of rfc3261?
>>>>
>>>> If the provider sent you a Record-Route of their own in addition to any
>>>> that you have placed there, your UAC must still follow it when
>>>> contacting them for in-dialog requests.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
>>>>
>>>> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
>>>> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20180702/01b75fda/attachment.html>