[SR-Users] Should I ignore Route header in ACK?

[Alex Balashov]

On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 12:03:24AM +0300, Yuriy Gorlichenko wrote:

> Just in continue of the discussion
> forund in the RFC3261 12.1.2  (UAC behaivor) this:
> 
>    The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route
>    header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving
>    all URI parameters.  If no Record-Route header field is present in
>    the response, the route set MUST be set to the empty set.  This route
>    set, even if empty, overrides any pre-existing route set for future
>    requests in this dialog.  The remote target MUST be set to the URI
>    from the Contact header field of the response.

Indeed. What is your intended thesis?

-- 
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC

Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free) 
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/