[SR-Users] failure route is not executed when suspended invite is cancelled
miconda at gmail.com
Sat Dec 22 10:17:20 CET 2018
so I looked at the code and the patch was catching the case of no
outgoing branches even for suspended transaction, to be coherent with
the case when the transaction is not suspended. Practically there are
two checks to detect these cases -- it is the code block at:
Why would you need a failure_route execution in this case? Being a
cancelled transaction by UAC, it should not be forwarded anymore.
I am trying to figure out if there is need to do a (rather complex)
failure_route execution, or better introduce a (more lightweight)
event_route for these cases (both with and without suspend).
On 20.12.18 15:39, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> Thanks for digging in further and providing the hints. I will look at
> it with the first chance.
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018, 13:39 Koray Vatansever
> <koray.vatansever at gmail.com <mailto:koray.vatansever at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> After some debugging I realized that when the following commit
> removed, failure route is executed as expected:
> I would appreciate if you help me on this issue.
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:15 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
> I didn't get the chance to look at it so far. Also this week
> is very busy, but when I get a chance, I will check it.
> On 12.11.18 07:58, Koray Vatansever wrote:
>> Hi Daniel,
>> Did you have a chance to have a look at the logs that I
>> provided to you?
>> If there is anything that I can do, just let me know.
>> On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 3:29 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> <miconda at gmail.com <mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>> On 07.11.18 06:46, Koray Vatansever wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> > I'm trying to upgrade kamailio from 4.2.7 to 5.1.5 and
>> I realized that
>> > when CANCEL is received for a suspended INVITE, failure
>> route is not
>> > executed in release 5.1.5.
>> > In 4.2.7 failure route is executed for this scenario.
>> > Is this the expected behaviour or am I missing something?
>> failure_route should be executed. Can you reproduce with
>> debug=3 and
>> send all the logs related to this call, from receiving
>> the INVITE till
>> the CANCEL is processed?
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda>
>> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin --
>> www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com <http://www.kamailioworld.com>
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 4-6, 2019 in Berlin; Mar 25-27, 2019, in Washington, DC, USA -- www.asipto.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the sr-users