[SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 163, Issue 15
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Mon Dec 17 08:48:28 CET 2018
Hello,
do not reply to digest messages, it is hard to figure out which of the
discussions there you are referring to and the archive is no longer easy
to follow by people willing to learn from mailing list.
For the duration of participating in a discussion, you should disable
the digest flag from your mailing list profile.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15.12.18 19:41, Toufic Mobarak wrote:
> Tnhxtx
>
> Regards,
> Toufic Mobarak
>
>
>> On Dec 15, 2018, at 6:00 AM, sr-users-request at lists.kamailio.org wrote:
>>
>> Send sr-users mailing list submissions to
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>> sr-users-request at lists.kamailio.org
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> sr-users-owner at lists.kamailio.org
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. Re: Routing of Audio and Video Stream. (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
>> 2. Problem with selection Transport Protocol - MultiHomed
>> Problem (YAS0 CANER)
>> 3. Re: Problem with selection Transport Protocol - MultiHomed
>> Problem (YAS0 CANER)
>> 4. Re: Routing of Audio and Video Stream. (Sergiu Pojoga)
>> 5. Re: Problem with selection Transport Protocol - MultiHomed
>> Problem (Daniel-Constantin Mierla)
>> 6. Issue on kamailio 4.1.9 of database reconnection (Emmanuel BUU)
>> 7. Re: Routing of Audio and Video Stream. (Abhijit Dutta)
>> 8. Re: Routing of Audio and Video Stream. (Abhijit Dutta)
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:54:44 +0100
>> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
>> <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>, Abhijit Dutta <duttaa at hotmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Routing of Audio and Video Stream.
>> Message-ID: <26c51f12-5242-4794-5124-f37bc523c7ae at gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I guess you still need to send the INVITE to Asterisk, right?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>> On 14.12.18 11:15, Abhijit Dutta wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to redirect only the audio stream towards Asterisk from
>>> Kamailio (Proxy) via RTPEngine and not to send the video stream to
>>> Asterisk. I am yet to get the complete reason why my client wants this
>>> to happen though.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Abhijit
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
>> Kamailio Advanced Training -- www.asipto.com
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20181214/6a31b141/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:27:46 +0000
>> From: YAS0 CANER <caner_yaso at hotmail.com>
>> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
>> <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>> Subject: [SR-Users] Problem with selection Transport Protocol -
>> MultiHomed Problem
>> Message-ID:
>> <VI1PR0401MB244679D866D9B8C0AB89CAEFEFA10 at VI1PR0401MB2446.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hello ,
>> i have trouble about selection transport protocol. i have tried so many thing but couldnt find TM selected which IPv? and protocol type (TCP or UDP)
>>
>>
>> For example;
>> i have 2 interface ipv6 and ipv4. i will route my message (INVITE-Register etc.) another node that use TCP and IPV6 , domain name is test1.test. TM module or some module resolve this domain to IPV6:UDP but i want to sent it over IPV6:TCP socket. so i cannot know which protocol is resolved and cannot route the right socket.
>>
>> $du variable show only sip:ali at test1.test
>>
>> Conclusion : There isn't any pseudo value about which destination of IP version will use.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Flow:
>>
>> UAC (IPv4:UDP) ----------> Kamailio (MultiHomed) ----> (TCP:IPv6)Kamailio
>>
>> ----
>> Kamailo (multiHomed ) cfg
>> ------
>> auto_bind_ipv6=1
>> dns_try_ipv6=yes
>> dns_retr_time=1
>> dns_retr_no=1
>> dns_cache_flags=4
>> mhomed=1
>> fork=yes
>> tcp_source_ipv6 = [fd61:c23c:b3b6::5]
>> listen=tcp:[fd61:c23c:b3b2::5]:5060
>> listen=udp:[fd61:c23c:b3b2::5]:5060
>> listen=udp:192.168.1.107:5060
>> listen=tcp:192.168.1.107:5060
>>
>>
>> route []{
>>
>> if($dP=="TCP"){
>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [TCP] 1\n");
>> if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>> exit;
>> }
>> } else if($dP=="TCP"){
>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [TCP] 2\n");
>> if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>> exit;
>> }
>> }else if($dP=="UDP"){
>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [UDP] 1\n");
>> if (!t_relay_to_udp()) {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>> exit;
>> }
>> }else{
>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [??] 1\n");
>> if (!t_relay()) {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>> exit;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20181214/a0f9214d/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 3
>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:35:07 +0000
>> From: YAS0 CANER <caner_yaso at hotmail.com>
>> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
>> <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Problem with selection Transport Protocol -
>> MultiHomed Problem
>> Message-ID:
>> <VI1PR0401MB2446399D76B7860935337045EFA10 at VI1PR0401MB2446.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hello;
>>
>> i want to force message to send over TCP and IPv6 . so it should be R/W variable. When i set $fs or force_send_socket() it gives error about mismatch protocol !
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Yasin CANER
>> ________________________________
>> From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of YAS0 CANER <caner_yaso at hotmail.com>
>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 4:27 PM
>> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> Subject: [SR-Users] Problem with selection Transport Protocol - MultiHomed Problem
>>
>> Hello ,
>> i have trouble about selection transport protocol. i have tried so many thing but couldnt find TM selected which IPv? and protocol type (TCP or UDP)
>>
>>
>> For example;
>> i have 2 interface ipv6 and ipv4. i will route my message (INVITE-Register etc.) another node that use TCP and IPV6 , domain name is test1.test. TM module or some module resolve this domain to IPV6:UDP but i want to sent it over IPV6:TCP socket. so i cannot know which protocol is resolved and cannot route the right socket.
>>
>> $du variable show only sip:ali at test1.test
>>
>> Conclusion : There isn't any pseudo value about which destination of IP version will use.
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Flow:
>>
>> UAC (IPv4:UDP) ----------> Kamailio (MultiHomed) ----> (TCP:IPv6)Kamailio
>>
>> ----
>> Kamailo (multiHomed ) cfg
>> ------
>> auto_bind_ipv6=1
>> dns_try_ipv6=yes
>> dns_retr_time=1
>> dns_retr_no=1
>> dns_cache_flags=4
>> mhomed=1
>> fork=yes
>> tcp_source_ipv6 = [fd61:c23c:b3b6::5]
>> listen=tcp:[fd61:c23c:b3b2::5]:5060
>> listen=udp:[fd61:c23c:b3b2::5]:5060
>> listen=udp:192.168.1.107:5060
>> listen=tcp:192.168.1.107:5060
>>
>>
>> route []{
>>
>> if($dP=="TCP"){
>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [TCP] 1\n");
>> if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>> exit;
>> }
>> } else if($dP=="TCP"){
>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [TCP] 2\n");
>> if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>> exit;
>> }
>> }else if($dP=="UDP"){
>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [UDP] 1\n");
>> if (!t_relay_to_udp()) {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>> exit;
>> }
>> }else{
>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [??] 1\n");
>> if (!t_relay()) {
>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>> exit;
>> }
>> }
>> }
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20181214/b0af8dea/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 08:53:27 -0500
>> From: Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas at gmail.com>
>> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
>> <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Routing of Audio and Video Stream.
>> Message-ID:
>> <CAJZsGCk1M3aUMUjK-+TnWOT18qV1oD4tM5-B6QYhxFfVdnLQgg at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>> sdp_remove_media("video");
>>
>> https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/sdpops.html#sdpops.f.sdp_remove_media
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:55 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> I guess you still need to send the INVITE to Asterisk, right?
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14.12.18 11:15, Abhijit Dutta wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to redirect only the audio stream towards Asterisk from
>>> Kamailio (Proxy) via RTPEngine and not to send the video stream to
>>> Asterisk. I am yet to get the complete reason why my client wants this to
>>> happen though.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Abhijit
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing Listsr-users at lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training -- www.asipto.com
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20181214/8b6fd041/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 5
>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:08:14 +0100
>> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
>> <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>, YAS0 CANER <caner_yaso at hotmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Problem with selection Transport Protocol -
>> MultiHomed Problem
>> Message-ID: <54f11683-128b-7385-1e12-0ac04d5a48ab at gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> is there any naptr or srv dns record behind test1.test domain? Or just
>> A/CNAME record?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>> On 14.12.18 14:35, YAS0 CANER wrote:
>>> Hello;
>>>
>>> i want to force message to send over TCP and IPv6 . so it should be
>>> R/W variable. When i set $fs or force_send_socket() it gives error
>>> about mismatch protocol !
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Yasin CANER
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of
>>> YAS0 CANER <caner_yaso at hotmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Friday, December 14, 2018 4:27 PM
>>> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>> *Subject:* [SR-Users] Problem with selection Transport Protocol -
>>> MultiHomed Problem
>>>
>>> Hello ,
>>> i have trouble about selection transport protocol. i have tried so
>>> many thing but couldnt find TM selected which IPv? and protocol type
>>> (TCP or UDP)
>>>
>>>
>>> For example;
>>> i have 2 interface ipv6 and ipv4. i will route my message
>>> (INVITE-Register etc.) another node that use TCP and IPV6 , domain
>>> name is test1.test. TM module or some module resolve this domain to
>>> IPV6:UDP but i want to sent it over IPV6:TCP socket. so i cannot
>>> know which protocol is resolved and cannot route the right socket.
>>>
>>> $du variable show only sip:ali at test1.test
>>>
>>> Conclusion : There isn't any pseudo value about which _destination of
>>> IP version_ will use.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Flow:
>>>
>>> UAC (IPv4:UDP) ----------> Kamailio (MultiHomed) ---->
>>> (TCP:IPv6)Kamailio
>>>
>>> ----
>>> Kamailo (multiHomed ) cfg
>>> ------
>>> auto_bind_ipv6=1
>>> dns_try_ipv6=yes
>>> dns_retr_time=1
>>> dns_retr_no=1
>>> dns_cache_flags=4
>>> mhomed=1
>>> fork=yes
>>> tcp_source_ipv6 = [fd61:c23c:b3b6::5]
>>> listen=tcp:[fd61:c23c:b3b2::5]:5060
>>> listen=udp:[fd61:c23c:b3b2::5]:5060
>>> listen=udp:192.168.1.107:5060
>>> listen=tcp:192.168.1.107:5060
>>>
>>>
>>> route []{
>>>
>>> if($dP=="TCP"){
>>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [TCP] 1\n");
>>> if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) {
>>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>>> exit;
>>> }
>>> } else if($dP=="TCP"){
>>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [TCP] 2\n");
>>> if (!t_relay_to_tcp()) {
>>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>>> exit;
>>> }
>>> }else if($dP=="UDP"){
>>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [UDP] 1\n");
>>> if (!t_relay_to_udp()) {
>>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>>> exit;
>>> }
>>> }else{
>>> xlog("L_INFO","[route] [??] 1\n");
>>> if (!t_relay()) {
>>> xlog("L_ERR", "Error t_relay [route] \n");
>>> t_reply("500","Server - ERROR ");
>>> exit;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
>> Kamailio Advanced Training -- www.asipto.com
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20181214/a8e0f3de/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 6
>> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 18:18:48 +0100
>> From: Emmanuel BUU <emmanuel.buu at ives.fr>
>> To: sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> Subject: [SR-Users] Issue on kamailio 4.1.9 of database reconnection
>> Message-ID: <51fb634a-011f-3d5b-6a91-e4450e3408c8 at ives.fr>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>>
>> Hi to the community,
>>
>> We are starting to use database clusters and would like improve the
>> availability of our kamailio server.
>>
>> We are curretly running kamailio 4.1.9 and we noticed that if we reboot
>> the database server, kamailio takes a llloong time to reconnect the
>> mysql connection
>>
>> and during this time, we fail to register. We see a lot of TCP
>> connections in status CLOSING.
>>
>> After a while, we see things going back to normal (> 30 min) but this is
>> too long. Can someone give us advice ?
>>
>> Has this issue been fixed in newer versions
>>
>> On kamalio side we're using mysql clients
>>
>> mysql-libs.x86_64 5.1.73-8.el6_8
>>
>> We have set the following parameters:
>>
>> modparam("db_mysql", "timeout_interval", 5)
>> modparam("db_mysql", "ping_interval", 60)
>> modparam("db_mysql", "auto_reconnect", 1)
>>
>> Emmanuel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 7
>> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 07:08:10 +0000
>> From: Abhijit Dutta <duttaa at hotmail.com>
>> To: "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List"
>> <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>, "miconda at gmail.com" <miconda at gmail.com>
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Routing of Audio and Video Stream.
>> Message-ID:
>> <CY1PR10MB0618603E7B3883357EBF1F32DEA20 at CY1PR10MB0618.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Its a pleasure and honour to get a response from you!! Thanks.
>>
>> Yes, Invite will go to Asterisk and below is the proposal -
>>
>> 1. Audio stream routed via Asterisk (this is currently done, so keep it as is)
>> 2. Video stream routed by Kamailio (RTPEngine) - do not pass it to Asterisk.
>>
>> If this is possible, then what changes we need in Kamailio side.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Abhijit
>> ________________________________
>> From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 11:54 AM
>> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List; Abhijit Dutta
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Routing of Audio and Video Stream.
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I guess you still need to send the INVITE to Asterisk, right?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 14.12.18 11:15, Abhijit Dutta wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is it possible to redirect only the audio stream towards Asterisk from Kamailio (Proxy) via RTPEngine and not to send the video stream to Asterisk. I am yet to get the complete reason why my client wants this to happen though.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Abhijit
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
>> www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>> Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com<http://www.kamailioworld.com>
>> Kamailio Advanced Training -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20181215/36df8efe/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Message: 8
>> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 07:24:46 +0000
>> From: Abhijit Dutta <duttaa at hotmail.com>
>> To: Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas at gmail.com>, "Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
>> List" <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Routing of Audio and Video Stream.
>> Message-ID:
>> <CY1PR10MB06181FAC3006E635184D2192DEA20 at CY1PR10MB0618.namprd10.prod.outlook.com>
>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>>
>> Hi Sergiu,
>>
>> Thank you for your help.
>>
>> If we remove the video m line, I have a doubt if the video stream will still get routed to destination (from Kamailio-RTPEngine). I do not want the video to be droped from the call. I am learning how to use Kamailio, so excuse me for my limited knowledge of the system.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Abhijit
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.kamailio.org> on behalf of Sergiu Pojoga <pojogas at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 1:53 PM
>> To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Routing of Audio and Video Stream.
>>
>> sdp_remove_media("video");
>>
>> https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/5.1.x/modules/sdpops.html#sdpops.f.sdp_remove_media
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 6:55 AM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com<mailto:miconda at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I guess you still need to send the INVITE to Asterisk, right?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 14.12.18 11:15, Abhijit Dutta wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Is it possible to redirect only the audio stream towards Asterisk from Kamailio (Proxy) via RTPEngine and not to send the video stream to Asterisk. I am yet to get the complete reason why my client wants this to happen though.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Abhijit
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
>> www.twitter.com/miconda<http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda<http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>> Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com<http://www.kamailioworld.com>
>> Kamailio Advanced Training -- www.asipto.com<http://www.asipto.com>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org<mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20181215/5da08ab4/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> End of sr-users Digest, Vol 163, Issue 15
>> *****************************************
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - May 6-8, 2019 -- www.kamailioworld.com
Kamailio Advanced Training -- www.asipto.com
More information about the sr-users
mailing list