[SR-Users] Final reply code is wrong in case of 302 and 486 busy
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Fri Aug 31 12:53:07 CEST 2018
Hello,
just a bit and my initial guess seem to apply -- adding branches in
branch failure route is like adding a new branch to the parallel forking
step of that branch, is not creating a serial forking.
The solution that I mentioned with script ops using flags or x/avps
should work.
Also you can try to play with:
*
https://kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/tm.html#tm.f.t_drop_replies
Maybe this function just works as it is or it can be extended to drop
only the current reply for that branch failure route, might be just a
bit of a C code.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 31.08.18 12:25, Marco Capetta wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> did you have some time to have a look at the issue?
>
> Thank you very much
>
> Regards
> Marco
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com
Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com
More information about the sr-users
mailing list