[SR-Users] topos module - possible bug
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
miconda at gmail.com
Mon May 8 07:44:45 CEST 2017
Try to make a pull request for it and if all ok it will be merged.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 06.05.17 17:20, Sergey Basov wrote:
> I found issue cause.
>
> After I have changed line 792 of the file tps_msg.c
> from
> if(tps_reappend_route(msg, &stsd, &stsd.b_rr, 0)<0) {
>
> to
> if(tps_reappend_route(msg, &stsd, &stsd.b_rr, 1)<0) {
>
> now route header are restores in from:
>
> Route: <sip:10.56.42.37:5070;lr;ftag=EN0cvoXXCOgdGoO2zizq-WNmE4Enf4Nt;did=434.5ce1;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgEAAgcAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>
> Route: <sip:KITS1.MSS.LIFE.COM:5060;transport=UDP;lr>
>
> Now ACK are routed correctly.
>
> Seems that earlier, before fix b_rr store into DB, we does not see
> this issue, because only last route header was saved...
> But after fix, we have all route records so we nned to restore it into
> wright way.
>
> Now I have worked scheme with 3 kamailio in a row, on first of them
> enabled topos on other only topoh module.
>
> Daniel, I will send to you latest dump in separate e-mail.
>
> Thank you.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>
>
> 2017-05-05 23:16 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov <sergey.v.basov at gmail.com>:
>> I think it is because wrong order of Route: header after restoring...
>>
>> With topoh enabled I have:
>>
>> Route: <sip:10.56.42.37:5070;lr;ftag=IpXq-LwNvJF6WrkOcmZNf9WjmGjK5dUv;did=90c.1132;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgEAAgcAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>
>> Route: <sip:KITS1.MSS.LIFE.COM:5060;transport=UDP;lr>
>>
>> But with topos enabled I have:
>>
>> Route: <sip:KITS1.MSS.LIFE.COM:5060;transport=UDP;lr>,<sip:10.56.42.37:5070;lr;ftag=EN0cvoXXCOgdGoO2zizq-WNmE4Enf4Nt;did=434.5ce1;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAgEAAgcAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>
>>
>> And kamailio trying to send ACK to KITS1.MSS.LIFE.COM:5060
>>
>> Can you fix it? Or I going in to wrong directuon?
>>
>> Thank you.
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>>
>>
>> 2017-05-05 20:32 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov <sergey.v.basov at gmail.com>:
>>> Hi Daniel
>>>
>>> Semms now we have ankther problem...
>>>
>>> b_rr weites in db correctly.
>>> But when ack is sending from A side it try to send to B side to cantact ip,
>>> ignoring record-route headers...
>>>
>>> I will try to debug this.
>>>
>>> If you have any idea I can test it.
>>>
>>> Thank you.
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Sergey Basov
>>>
>>> 28 апр. 2017 г. 7:25 PM пользователь "Sergey Basov"
>>> <sergey.v.basov at gmail.com> написал:
>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel.
>>>>
>>>> Seems all is ok now.
>>>>
>>>> I applyed your patch and add my additional debug string.
>>>>
>>>> Now result is:
>>>>
>>>> Apr 28 19:15:52 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[14177]: DEBUG: topos
>>>> [tps_msg.c:464]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers - b_rr:
>>>>
>>>> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1Ek2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>](84)
>>>>
>>>> Apr 28 19:15:52 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[14177]: DEBUG: topos
>>>> [tps_msg.c:464]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers - b_rr:
>>>>
>>>> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1Ek2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>,<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEk.dED.sRD.TSD.z2k.sEGLlvygavebZAeLqVDJ7cZRoXPrXUYbGjQdPrTMqbYddReRXWQs9xWXFYupcMQuTfehTjD.lRkhavPbGJxsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsdvPbG7xsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXne7YnTuP.TsXnTsFnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn>](349)
>>>>
>>>> Apr 28 19:15:52 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[14177]: DEBUG: topos
>>>> [tps_msg.c:464]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers - b_rr:
>>>>
>>>> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1Ek2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>,<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEk.dED.sRD.TSD.z2k.sEGLlvygavebZAeLqVDJ7cZRoXPrXUYbGjQdPrTMqbYddReRXWQs9xWXFYupcMQuTfehTjD.lRkhavPbGJxsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsdvPbG7xsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXne7YnTuP.TsXnTsFnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn>,<sip:10.56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=F.m-GnEuqBVsqhGWBMgTA6gaRiJOHRUY;did=d41.3811;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>](556)
>>>>
>>>> Apr 28 19:15:52 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[14177]: DEBUG: topos
>>>> [tps_msg.c:482]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr: [](0) -
>>>> b_rr:
>>>> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1Ek2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>,<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEk.dED.sRD.TSD.z2k.sEGLlvygavebZAeLqVDJ7cZRoXPrXUYbGjQdPrTMqbYddReRXWQs9xWXFYupcMQuTfehTjD.lRkhavPbGJxsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsdvPbG7xsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXne7YnTuP.TsXnTsFnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn>,<sip:10.56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=F.m-GnEuqBVsqhGWBMgTA6gaRiJOHRUY;did=d41.3811;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>](556)
>>>> - s_rr: [](0)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Seems this issue is solved.
>>>>
>>>> Can you apply this patch to 5.0 branch?
>>>> Then may be Pete Kelly will install nightly build of the 5.0.1 and
>>>> confirm that issu is solved.
>>>>
>>>> I does not have such count of sbc for test )
>>>>
>>>> Thank you Daniel.
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2017-04-28 17:14 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> many thanks Sergey for troubleshooting, it saved a lot of time!
>>>>> Hopefully I caught the issue. Can you test with latest master branch and
>>>>> let me know if works?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 28.04.17 14:57, Sergey Basov wrote:
>>>>>> Some more debug
>>>>>>
>>>>>> after adding debug output after each iteration I got:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apr 28 15:51:51 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13743]: DEBUG: topos
>>>>>> [tps_msg.c:457]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers - b_rr:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEkMcFYXzjDMqpsSozWseXDMGxppCqzh1Ek2ZS1uoLBVfSPhqYZXlvyga*>](84)
>>>>>> Apr 28 15:51:51 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13743]: DEBUG: topos
>>>>>> [tps_msg.c:457]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers - b_rr:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [<sip:127.0.0.8;line=sr-BRwEk.dED.sRD.TSD.z2k.sEGLlvygavebZAeLq9pRZROhZq1.F9BJfpywe1pMz7PLB8GdeF1RFST377QpcMQuTfepwJDJZ.zhdvPbGJxsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsdvPbG7xsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXne7YnTuP.TsXnTsFnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXnTsXn>](348)
>>>>>> Apr 28 15:51:51 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13743]: DEBUG: topos
>>>>>> [tps_msg.c:457]: tps_pack_message(): sbasov compacted headers - b_rr:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [<sip:10.56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=iOdvx4ub2iroSnVXNC4w784FIcbrB-4i;did=e9f.5f22;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>](554)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apr 28 15:51:51 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13743]: DEBUG: topos
>>>>>> [tps_msg.c:475]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr: [](0) -
>>>>>> b_rr:
>>>>>> [<sip:10.56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=iOdvx4ub2iroSnVXNC4w784FIcbrB-4i;did=e9f.5f22;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>](554)
>>>>>> - s_rr: [](0)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So size are computed correctly, but part of record-routes
>>>>>> disappears.... And we can see correct size of the record but only last
>>>>>> part of the record-routes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope it helps
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2017-04-28 15:37 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov <sergey.v.basov at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>> One more detail
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When debug=3 I see in logs (look at size of record and it contents)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apr 28 14:16:44 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13287]: DEBUG: topos
>>>>>>> [tps_msg.c:473]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr: [](0) -
>>>>>>> b_rr: [](0) - s_rr:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [<sip:10.56.42.33;r2=on;lr;ftag=ed1qg.1TlqHP7frDwZWwhcyKAcOfIVTn;did=a4b.fc01;vsf=AAAAAAoLAQ4DAA4DAHlnYg5heGJnG3Rnd3MebX14CTUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAMOAwEABwcEAwd3AnBlfGJ9BRxjYGAUeXl/dRU2PChyPXBob25l;nat=yes>,<sip:212.58.160.253:5061;transport=tls;r2=on;lr;ftag=ed1qg.1TlqHP7frDwZWwhcyKAcOfIVTn;did=a4b.fc01;vsf=AAAAAAoLAQ4DAA4DAHlnYg5heGJnG3Rnd3MebX14CTUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAMOAwEABwcEAwd3AnBlfGJ9BRxjYGAUeXl/dRU2PChyPXBob25l;nat=yes>](453)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 453 - is a real size of shown header
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> s_rr parses normal, but b_rr
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apr 28 14:16:48 csbc-uat /usr/sbin/kamailio[13273]: DEBUG: topos
>>>>>>> [tps_msg.c:473]: tps_pack_message(): compacted headers - a_rr: [](0) -
>>>>>>> b_rr:
>>>>>>> [<sip:10.56.42.33:5090;lr;ftag=ed1qg.1TlqHP7frDwZWwhcyKAcOfIVTn;did=a4b.6ec;vsf=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABlY2Bmf359HGJ6cX8bc3h9OjUwNjA7dXNlcj1waG9uZQ--;vst=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAAAOAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA>](553)
>>>>>>> - s_rr: [](0)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 553 - seems a real correct size of the recordroute header and it
>>>>>>> differs from size with \0 at the end
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2017-04-28 14:46 GMT+03:00 Sergey Basov <sergey.v.basov at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>> Hi All.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just try to pass call throught 3 kamailio.
>>>>>>>> I got result like yours
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you need testers for patch - I am ready )
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov e-mail: sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2017-04-28 12:57 GMT+03:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>> <miconda at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>> There seems to be an issue saving the record-route list for b-side
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> topos_d table -- first two are saved but then there are only 0
>>>>>>>>> characters
>>>>>>>>> instead of the rest of record routes:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> '<sip:192.168.252.75;r2=on;lr=on;ftag=A1;did=072.87c;rtpi=1;nat=no;rtpi=1>\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will have to dig a bit into the code.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers, Daniel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 27.04.17 14:30, Pete Kelly wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes no problem. I wanted to come but the life schedule would not
>>>>>>>>> allow it
>>>>>>>>> this time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 27 April 2017 at 13:11, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>> <miconda at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> time, I need more time :-) ... with Kamailio World Conference
>>>>>>>>>> around the
>>>>>>>>>> corner, I am caught in a lot of admin tasks...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 27.04.17 13:11, Pete Kelly wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Is there anything else you need on this?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 15:06, Pete Kelly <pkelly at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It's CSeq 1, fromtag A1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> DB attached
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 15:03, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>> <miconda at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you paste here the from tag or cseq for the dialog you are
>>>>>>>>>>>> referring
>>>>>>>>>>>> to? Because the number of frames are not matching my pcap viewer.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Send also the db dump, they should reveal if something is broken
>>>>>>>>>>>> there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26.04.17 14:46, Pete Kelly wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Ah I see why it is confusing
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This setup maintains a Call-ID through an SBC downstream, so the
>>>>>>>>>>>> INVITE's you see have the same Call-ID but they have a different
>>>>>>>>>>>> fromtag/cseq, Wireshark shows them all as one call which is
>>>>>>>>>>>> annoying when
>>>>>>>>>>>> looking at the viewer!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you check the first call only between 252.70 and 252.75 you
>>>>>>>>>>>> will see
>>>>>>>>>>>> INVITE (frame 4), 200OK (frame 16) with lots of RR headers.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The ACK generated by topos (frame 21) only contains 1 Route
>>>>>>>>>>>> header, it
>>>>>>>>>>>> should contain more so the request can hop through the proxy
>>>>>>>>>>>> chain as shown
>>>>>>>>>>>> in frame 16.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I see the example from Sergey is working, but there is only 1 RR
>>>>>>>>>>>> header
>>>>>>>>>>>> in this example - as you can see from my example the topos module
>>>>>>>>>>>> uses the
>>>>>>>>>>>> first RR header but ignores the other 5.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have the DB dump and logfiles from this call too if useful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 12:41, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>> <miconda at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I could notice upon a quick look, there seems to be two calls
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- two
>>>>>>>>>>>>> INVITE requests having same call id but different cseq. Can you
>>>>>>>>>>>>> confirm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> this is the case? Because the capture doesn't seem to have all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> incoming/outgoing messages, some are missing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26.04.17 12:59, Sergey Basov wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You give to us very hard callflow...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Without any pauses between responces..
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some requests go through 127.0.0.1... But responces from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 127.0.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not present.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are peers from which invites not present in dump. I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not see
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ful path of the initial Invite, but there is responses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will send dump in next email directly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov e-mail:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sergey.v.basov at gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-04-26 11:01 GMT+03:00 Pete Kelly <pkelly at gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attached is the pcap from latest nightly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As you can see (frame 21) the ACK is incorrect, I believe it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> specify
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all the hops from the 200OK (frame 16) so that the hop by hop
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ACK
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> routed via the proxy chain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> topoh module works fine.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 05:18, Sergey Basov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sergey.v.basov at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I dont know how nightly builds are done.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just try with latest 5.0.1 nightly and send new dump.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As I understud topos module done to remove record-route
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> headers to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hide
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> topology... Am I wright, Daniel?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And try to disable topos module and enable topoh module. Will
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all work
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as you expecrs?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25 апр. 2017 г. 11:31 PM пользователь "Pete Kelly"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pkelly at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have tried with 5.0.1 from today (25th April).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you saying build for 26th will have some fixes?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 April 2017 at 18:59, Sergey Basov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sergey.v.basov at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Actualy latest fixes to 180/183/200, ACK and memory leak
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pushed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.0 and master branch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, please try with latest 5.0.1 nightly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25 апр. 2017 г. 8:55 PM пользователь "Pete Kelly"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pkelly at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Call is with sipp but first goes through another SBC to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean up
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SIP (in case of problems with sipp via headers etc).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The traces I've done are actually with 4.4.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Will they be OK or would you prefer 5.0.1? The problem is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same on both.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 April 2017 at 16:25, Sergey Basov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <sergey.v.basov at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you send dump of the call with kamailio 5.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nightly?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And does you make call using sipp?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Basov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 25 апр. 2017 г. 5:57 PM пользователь "Pete Kelly"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <pkelly at gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Looks like from last night:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.0.1+0~20170425013247.36+trusty
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25 April 2017 at 15:42, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to be sure, it is 5.0.1 build from last night or quite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> recent? There
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were some fixes in the past days to topos module.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 25.04.17 15:59, Pete Kelly wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delayed response to this, the ACK is for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 200OK yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the problem still persists in latest 4.4 and the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5.0.1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nightly build.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have all DB entries/kam logs/pcap files.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you check the attached pcap, 192.168.70.70 and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 192.168.252.70 are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the same instance of Kamailio, it is being used to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bridge the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 networks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Frame 34 shows the 200OK with lots of Record-Route etc,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frame 35
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows topos in action.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However the ACK that is relayed in Frame 38 seems to be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> missing all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Route information that was supplied in the 200OK,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> causes the ACK to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be relayed directly to the Contact, breaking the proxy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> chain.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pete
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22 February 2017 at 18:31, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <miconda at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is the ACK for 200ok? Or an ack for a negative
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> response?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you get a pcap for such situation with all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the call?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/02/2017 17:20, Pete Kelly wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using the topos module when bridging 2 networks
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The INVITE/200OK part of the transaction is working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> fine
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (i.e. the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact on both sides matches correctly the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> corresponding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> network).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> However when the ACK is sent into Kamailio, instead of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> realising
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the next hop is myself and skipping it, Kamailio is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sending
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the ACK directly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to itself as a packet, causing the call setup to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> break.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any advice for this situation?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mailing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 6-8 (Europe) and Mar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20-22
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (USA) -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -
>>>>>>>>>>>> www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com
>>>>>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>>>>>>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com
>>>>> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
>>>>>
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - May 22-24 (USA) - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 - www.kamailioworld.com
More information about the sr-users
mailing list