[SR-Users] Topoh module & call leg/transaction does not exist

Olli Attila olli.attila at oatel.net
Fri Mar 3 14:50:56 CET 2017


Hello,

The B party (IP: 37.219.148.155) is the one that sends the bye. A party 
(IP: 178.75.176.146) will never see this bye because Kamailio (IP: 
193.28.89.162) in the middle replies to B party with 481. The result is 
that A partys softphone thinks the call is still online.

This can be seen on the kamailio_5-0_sip481.pcap trace.

Cheers,

--Olli

On 2.3.2017 16:19, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the pcap file doesn't show the BYE coming from caller to proxy. There 
> is only the BYE from proxy to callee. I need also the one coming to 
> the proxy in order to see if the required headers are there.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 28/02/2017 21:47, Olli Attila wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm still having this issue and now running the new Kamailio 5.0 
>> branch. The pcap trace is attached to this email which shows the 
>> whole sip conversation before and after topology hiding.
>>
>> Has anyone stumbled upon this kind of "SIP 481 Call leg/Transaction 
>> does not exist" error when routing BYE messages while using topoh 
>> module?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --Olli
>>
>>
>> On 19.2.2017 23:23, Olli Attila wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I recently started testing topology hiding module on Kamailio and 
>>> encountered a problem where B party hangs up, Kamailio can't 
>>> identify the ongoing transaction to which the BYE should be related 
>>> to and instead of tearing the call down Kamailio just sends back 
>>> "481 Call leg/Transaction does not exist" to B party.
>>> On Kamailio config I have only enabled the topoh.so -module with 
>>> default options and configured this to enable masking:
>>> modparam("topoh", "mask_callid", 1)
>>>
>>> Here is what the INVITE to B party looks like and the BYE message 
>>> coming from the B party:
>>> http://pastebin.com/raw/f63zUmid
>>>
>>> When debugging on Kamailio end i get:
>>> http://pastebin.com/raw/ZefGAz30
>>>
>>> Is this a Kamailio issue or a softphone issue on B party end?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> --Olli
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> www.twitter.com/miconda  --www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training - Mar 6-8 (Europe) and Mar 20-22 (USA) -www.asipto.com
> Kamailio World Conference - May 8-10, 2017 -www.kamailioworld.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170303/7ea89cb7/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list