[SR-Users] why is tcp_no_connect disabled by default

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Ohh, misinterpreted tcp_no_connect=no is tcp_no_connect=0, which is the
default.

My other remark related to user location was for the case of
tcp_no_connect=yes, which I thought is what was meant initially.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 27.07.17 13:30, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> do you have tcp_no_connect=no in your config? Because I think the
> default value is 0.
>
> It is useful when you have client behind the nat that closed the
> connection, but the contact record is still valid in location table.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 27.07.17 13:09, Vik Killa wrote:
>> I'm trying to understand the scenario when `tcp_no_connect` should
>> ever be set to `no`.
>> Kamailio comes with `tcp_no_connect=no` by default which means it
>> will try (and seemingly always fail) to create an outbound tcp
>> connection when a UAC's tcp connection is lost. This in-turn could
>> start building up the tcp write queue and can be disastrous at scale.
>> So why would this setting (`tcp_no_connect=no`) ever be useful?
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
>> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com
> Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170727/e062544d/attachment-0001.html>