[SR-Users] dns failover and branches

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

On 19.07.17 11:00, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
>
>> OK, so it is creating a new branch structure. That could explain why the
>> branch flags from previous INVITE are not there. If it is only the
>> branch flags missing (and the headers changes are already propagated), I
>> expect to be an easy patch. I will look into it very soon if nobody else
>> does it meanwhile.
> I did more checking and looks like only branch flags are gone.  In
> addition to adding headers and setting branch flags, branch route adds
> record-route params using add_rr_param calls and also those params are
> preserved in the second INVITE.
>
Sounded rather simple, so I did a quick search in the code and just
pushed a patch for it -- very small, but hopefully it fixes this. If all
tests are fine for you, then you can backport as needed to stable branches.

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com