[SR-Users] TR: Failure Mode

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

looking at the trace, the routing is parallel forking, because the two
branches are sent out at the same time, it is no final response to the
first branch before the second is sent out.

Are you sure you sent out the second branch from failure route? From the
sip trace is doesn't seem so.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 07.07.17 15:38, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
>
> Hello Daniel,
>
>  
>
> Thanks !
>
>  
>
> I sent all the information’s to your email address
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *De :*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda at gmail.com]
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 7 juillet 2017 13:21
> *À :* Nicolas Breuer <Nicolas.Breuer at belcenter.biz>; Kamailio (SER) -
> Users Mailing List <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
> *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] TR: Failure Mode
>
>  
>
> Can you get a ngrep trace captured on kamailio server for such situation?
>
> Also, can you paste the failure_route block here along with the log
> messages from the syslog?
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>  
>
> On 07.07.17 12:42, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
>
>     I think serial because the new branch is only created in case the
>     first is timeout.
>
>      
>
>     *De :*Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:miconda at gmail.com]
>     *Envoyé :* vendredi 7 juillet 2017 12:40
>     *À :* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>     <sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>     <mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>; Nicolas Breuer
>     <Nicolas.Breuer at belcenter.biz> <mailto:Nicolas.Breuer at belcenter.biz>
>     *Objet :* Re: [SR-Users] TR: Failure Mode
>
>      
>
>     Hello,
>
>     are you doing parallel forking or serial forking?
>
>     Cheers,
>     Daniel
>
>      
>
>     On 07.07.17 12:24, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
>
>         * *
>
>          
>
>         Hello,
>
>          
>
>         Some help here is needed
>
>          
>
>         # auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg
>
>         modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3)
>
>          
>
>         I test a call with two branches.
>
>          
>
>         1^st branch received a 408 timeout error
>
>         2nd branch received a 486 busy.
>
>          
>
>         Normally the failure route should be with the 486.
>
>          
>
>         NOTICE: <script>: Failure route -----2---1--408----
>
>          
>
>         We can see the 408 is the winning reply but I understood from
>         the documentation that if
>
>         Failure reply mode is “3” , the winning reply is always the
>         reply from the last branch J
>
>          
>
>         It’s a problem because if  the 1^st is timeout (because down),
>         the second is OK but callee is busy ; we don’t send the right
>         reply to the caller
>
>          
>
>          
>
>          
>
>          
>
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>
>         Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>
>         sr-users at lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>
>         https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
>
>
>     -- 
>
>     Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>
>     www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
>
>     Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
>
>     Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com <http://www.kamailioworld.com>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> www.twitter.com/miconda <http://www.twitter.com/miconda> -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda <http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda>
> Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com <http://www.asipto.com>
> Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com <http://www.kamailioworld.com>

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170710/58f2511f/attachment.html>