[SR-Users] TR: Failure Mode

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

are you doing parallel forking or serial forking?

Cheers,
Daniel


On 07.07.17 12:24, Nicolas Breuer wrote:
>
> * *
>
>  
>
> Hello,
>
>  
>
> Some help here is needed
>
>  
>
> # auto-discard branches from previous serial forking leg
>
> modparam("tm", "failure_reply_mode", 3)
>
>  
>
> I test a call with two branches.
>
>  
>
> 1^st branch received a 408 timeout error
>
> 2nd branch received a 486 busy.
>
>  
>
> Normally the failure route should be with the 486.
>
>  
>
> NOTICE: <script>: Failure route -----2---1--408----
>
>  
>
> We can see the 408 is the winning reply but I understood from the
> documentation that if
>
> Failure reply mode is “3” , the winning reply is always the reply from
> the last branch J
>
>  
>
> It’s a problem because if  the 1^st is timeout (because down), the
> second is OK but callee is busy ; we don’t send the right reply to the
> caller
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170707/c5db97aa/attachment.html>