[SR-Users] evapi module and async_relay

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Hello,

Can you check with netstat the recv and send queues for the sockets used
in this communication? If the recv queu for receiving up is big, then it
cannot handle the traffic fast enough.

Cheers,
Daniel


On 28.06.17 21:58, Diego Nadares wrote:
> Sorry, maybe this log clarifies what I meant:
>
> These are the messages that my client read. It's connected to
> 127.0.0.1 to kamailio evapi.
>
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,313 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,401 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,444 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,456 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,521 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,565 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,604 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 2
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,649 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,687 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 2
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,730 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,857 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,896 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,921 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:50,929 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,029 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,180 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,235 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,279 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,337 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,380 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,491 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,521 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,630 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,706 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,787 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,893 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,917 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,929 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:51,970 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 2
> 2017-06-27 19:29:52,016 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:52,345 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:52,363 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:52,553 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:52,592 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:52,605 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:52,766 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 1
> 2017-06-27 19:29:53,002 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 5
> 2017-06-27 19:29:53,226 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 4
> 2017-06-27 19:29:54,716 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 15
> 2017-06-27 19:29:56,260 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 30
> 2017-06-27 19:29:59,183 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 52
> 2017-06-27 19:30:04,104 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 77
> 2017-06-27 19:30:12,158 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 128
> 2017-06-27 19:30:24,277 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 180
> 2017-06-27 19:30:42,990 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 327
> 2017-06-27 19:31:20,273 - routing - INFO - netstrings in message 645
>
> I hope this answer your question.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Diego
>
>
> 2017-06-28 12:04 GMT-03:00 Alex Balashov <abalashov at evaristesys.com
> <mailto:abalashov at evaristesys.com>>:
>
>     On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 11:59:31AM -0300, Diego Nadares wrote:
>
>     > It's weird. When sends 1 or 2 net strings per message I see that
>     my client
>     > receives ~18 messages per second. When starts to grow the amount of
>     > netstrings the messages received decrease to 1 per second and fewer.
>
>     Do you mean that the objective rate at which the client receives the
>     messages decreases, or that a very large amount of them end up
>     buffered
>     into a smaller number of packets, with the same effective throughput?
>
>     -- Alex
>
>     --
>     Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
>
>     Tel: +1-706-510-6800 <tel:%2B1-706-510-6800> / +1-800-250-5920
>     <tel:%2B1-800-250-5920> (toll-free)
>     Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>     sr-users at lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users at lists.kamailio.org>
>     https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>     <https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training - www.asipto.com
Kamailio World Conference - www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170703/04946be7/attachment.html>