[SR-Users] serial forking calls using TSILO
Federico Cabiddu
federico.cabiddu at gmail.com
Sun Jan 22 16:24:17 CET 2017
Hi,
could you please provide the LOCATION route and the Kamailio's log at level
3?
Thank you.
Regards,
Federico
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Tomas Zanet <tzanet at came.com> wrote:
> Hello,
> I’m using Kamailio 4.4.4 with TSILO module in order to support Push
> Notifications used by our voip app on Apple ios10.
> So far, everything works fine: Kamailio can get an incoming call, suspend
> it, then send push notification with an external script, receive a new app
> registration and then call it after resuming the invite.
> To do so, thanks to Mr, Cabiddu, I used all the functions described here
> http://www.kamailio.org/events/2015-KamailioWorld/
> Day2/20-Federico.Cabiddu-Kamailio-In-A-Mobile-World.pdf
>
>
> Right now, I would like to support serial forking calls using push
> notification because it was already supported with legacy voip.
> To do so, I used failure_route function where, after getting the call
> destinations and setting them into an avp, I set the new SIP request uri
> $ru.
> Here is my failure_route:
> failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE]
> route(NATMANAGE);
> if (t_is_canceled())
> exit;
>
>
> #!ifdef WITH_BLOCK3XX
> # block call redirect based on 3xx replies.
> if (t_check_status("3[0-9][0-9]"))
> t_reply("404","Not found");
> exit;
>
> #!endif
>
> if (is_avp_set("$avp(group_members_db)"))
> $ru ="sip:"+$avp(group_members_db)+"@"+$fd;
> $avp(group_members_db) = $null;
> route(LOCATION);
> exit;
>
>
>
> I am troubleshooting this scenario and this is what I see:
> 1) Kamailio receives incoming call
> 2) Suspend it
> 3) Send Push notification to account1
> 4) Kamailio receives account1 registration -> INVRESUME route is now called
> 5) Then call account1
> 6) Nobody answers the call
> 7) failure_route[MANAGE_FAILURE] is now called -> set $ru with next
> sipaccount: account2
> 8) suspend invite
> 9) send push notification to account2
> 10) account2 sends its sip registration -> INVRESUME route is now called
> 11) Kamailio calls account1 instead of account2 -> this is my issue
>
> On step 10: despite account2 is registered, I checked it using “kamctl ul
> show”, the second call is forwarded all'account1 and not to account2.
> I also checked the TSILO logs and everything seems ok. Here is the logs:
> First call:
> suspended transaction [53945:1648394094] asterisk => account1
> htable key value [53945:1648394094]
> resuming trasaction [53945:1648394094] account1 53945:1648394094)
> second call:
> suspended transaction [53945:1648394094] asterisk => account2
> htable key value [53945:1648394094]
> resuming trasaction [53945:1648394094] account2 53945:1648394094)
>
> In order to find out the issue I put some xlogs, printing $ru value: what
> I see is the $ru value is set correctly on failure_route but as soon as the
> t_continue is called, the ru overwritten back to account1
>
> Can anyone address me to find out the solution?
> Thanks in advance
>
> T.
>
>
>
>
> *Tomas Zanet *Software Design Department
> tzanet at came.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170122/2e010f85/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list