[SR-Users] [ *SPAM* 5.1 ] Re: carrierroute and failure route

[Yu Boot]

Here's full kamailio.cfg https://pastebin.com/EY4JXf8e


Any help what's wrong will be appreciated


Now the only problem is carrierroute to Mediant...


03.08.2017 15:14, Sebastian Damm пишет:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:48 PM, Yu Boot <yu at yu-boot.ru> wrote:
>> First one works OK, but if second route triggers, the following disaster
>> occurs (tshark dump) https://pastebin.com/00Ayty36
> it's not really a disaster. The Mediant2000 sends out a reINVITE after
> the call was established. The client responds with a 200 OK, but then
> the ACK is sent to the wrong request URI. While in the reINVITE the
> request URI was "sip:200 at 172.16.0.158:5060;alias=1.2.176.33~5060~1",
> it is "sip:200 at 172.16.0.158:5060" later in the ACK.
>
> My guess is you're record routing your packets even in loose routing.
> And you're not doing adding contact aliases there. I've seen before
> that clients then re-learn their route to the other side and fuck up
> loose routing.
>
> You should only call record_route() in the initial call setup, never
> again after the 200 OK. Then you should be fine.
>
> Regards,
> Sebastian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users at lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20170803/2b31cb2e/attachment.html>