[SR-Users] Malformed To header, or?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda at gmail.com
Thu Nov 3 14:34:47 CET 2016


Hello,


is there a '+' missing after sip: in the To of the re-invite vs the From
of the initial invite?


Cheers,
Daniel


On 03/11/16 14:08, Tobias wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> This is what it looks like.
>
>
> Initial INVITE after passing Kamailio:
> From: +num_1
> <sip:+num_1 at localip>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.
> To: <sip:+num_2 at localip:5060;user=phone>.
>
> Incoming reINVITE:
> From:
> <sip:+num_2 at remoteip:5060;user=phone>;tag=SD1sf9099-32997070347920161028161732.
> To: +num_1
> <sip:num_1 at localip>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.
>
> Kind regards,
> /Tobias
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 3, 2016 1:59 PM
> *To:* Tobias; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Malformed To header, or?
>  
>
> Hello,
>
>
> the question is if the value in the step 5 is the same as in step 3,
> or the endpoint does further modifications (changing what it received
> in step 3)?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
>
> On 03/11/16 10:20, Tobias wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> The To-header in the reINVITE is changed by the endpoint as far as I
>> can see (if I understand your question correctly), i.e. something
>> like this:
>>
>> 1) INVITE from endpoint to Kamailio
>>
>> 2) Kamailio performs uac_replace_from()
>>
>> 3) INVITE from Kamailio to endpoint (From-header modified)
>>
>> 4) dialogue goes on..
>>
>> 5) reINVITE from endpoint to Kamailio (To-header modified using data
>> from modified From-header in step #3)
>>
>> 6) reINVITE from Kamailio to endpoint, ip-address becomes scrambled
>>
>>
>> I can send you the whole SIP conversation if it helps.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> /Tobias
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> *From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>> *Sent:* Thursday, November 3, 2016 9:57 AM
>> *To:* Tobias; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Malformed To header, or?
>>  
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> are the From/To headers changed by the endpoint? Or the are the same
>> as in the initial INVITE/200ok?
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>> On 02/11/16 14:57, Tobias wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>>
>>> Correct, we're using uac_replace_from() when passing along the
>>> initial INVITE. That INVITE looks good so it's not until this
>>> reINVITE that the header is scrambled.
>>>
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>>
>>> /Tobias
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> *From:* Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, November 2, 2016 10:12 AM
>>> *To:* Tobias; Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Malformed To header, or?
>>>  
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> kamailio is not adding user=phone to To header by itself, it has to
>>> be something in the kamailio.cfg. What do you use to change the To?
>>> Or for changing From in initial INVITE?
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Daniel
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/11/16 20:35, Tobias wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your quick response. Makes totally sense, I'll need to
>>>> debug why I'm getting that malformed header.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you think my second question is related? I cannot see the same
>>>> malformed data in the example where the to-header is rewritten, it
>>>> just looks like Kamailio adds ";user=phone" but the ip address is
>>>> all obfuscated:
>>>>
>>>> A similar issue seen, which for some reason doesn't create an
>>>> ERROR, is when Kamailio receives a reINVITE looking like this which
>>>> it's supposed to proxy:
>>>> To: +123456789
>>>> <sip:123456789 at 127.0.0.1>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.
>>>> which is rewritten into:
>>>> To: +123456789
>>>> <sip:123456789 at 127*0-)'.:/)&7'...0;user=phone>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.
>>>> and sent out..
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> /Tobias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> *From:* sr-users <sr-users-bounces at lists.sip-router.org> on behalf
>>>> of Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>
>>>> *Sent:* Monday, October 31, 2016 9:07 AM
>>>> *To:* Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [SR-Users] Malformed To header, or?
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the to header doesn't have the ending '>' after its uri:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <<+123456789 <sip:123456789 at 127.0.0.1;tag=as4aa27bd0>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The first << and last >> are from the log messages, but before
>>>> ;tag=, it has to be another >, to close the one started before <sip:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 28/10/16 21:14, Tobias wrote:
>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>> Having some issues with Kamailio 4.3 reporting a malformed header,
>>>>> but I cannot seem to figure out what's wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> The problem seen is:
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core>
>>>>> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:678]: parse_addr_spec(): ERROR: parse_to
>>>>> : unexpected char [#015] in status 6: <<+123456789
>>>>> <sip:123456789 at 127.0.0.1;tag=as4aa27bd0>> .
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core>
>>>>> [parser/msg_parser.c:165]: get_hdr_field(): ERROR: get_hdr_field:
>>>>> bad to header
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: INFO: <core>
>>>>> [parser/msg_parser.c:338]: parse_headers(): ERROR: bad header
>>>>> field [To: +123456789 <si]
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: tm
>>>>> [t_lookup.c:1050]: t_check_msg(): ERROR: reply cannot be parsed
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core>
>>>>> [parser/parse_addr_spec.c:678]: parse_addr_spec(): ERROR: parse_to
>>>>> : unexpected char [#015] in status 6: <<+123456789
>>>>> <sip:123456789 at 127.0.0.1;tag=as4aa27bd0>> .
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core>
>>>>> [parser/msg_parser.c:165]: get_hdr_field(): ERROR: get_hdr_field:
>>>>> bad to header
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: INFO: <core>
>>>>> [parser/msg_parser.c:338]: parse_headers(): ERROR: bad header
>>>>> field [To: +123456789 <si]
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core>
>>>>> [msg_translator.c:1457]: adjust_clen(): error parsing content-length
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core>
>>>>> [msg_translator.c:2214]: generate_res_buf_from_sip_res(): error
>>>>> while adjusting Content-Length
>>>>> Oct 27 13:48:56  /usr/sbin/kamailio[13765]: ERROR: <core>
>>>>> [forward.c:760]: do_forward_reply(): building failed
>>>>>
>>>>> And the To header seen at this point is:
>>>>> To: +123456789 <sip:123456789 at 127.0.0.1>;tag=as24ed5606.
>>>>>
>>>>> version: kamailio 4.3.4 (x86_64/linux) 
>>>>> flags: STATS: Off, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, USE_SCTP, TLS_HOOKS,
>>>>> USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM,
>>>>> SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX,
>>>>> FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER,
>>>>> USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES
>>>>> ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN
>>>>> 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 8MB
>>>>> poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select.
>>>>> id: unknown 
>>>>> compiled with gcc 4.7.2
>>>>>
>>>>> I obviously understand Kamailio views this To header as malformed,
>>>>> but what I cannot understand is why? Is it as simple as the number
>>>>> +123456789 is not enclosed with ", i.e. it should be sent
>>>>> as "+123456789"?
>>>>>
>>>>> A similar issue seen, which for some reason doesn't create an
>>>>> ERROR, is when Kamailio receives a reINVITE looking like this
>>>>> which it's supposed to proxy:
>>>>> To: +123456789
>>>>> <sip:123456789 at 127.0.0.1>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.
>>>>> which is rewritten into:
>>>>> To: +123456789
>>>>> <sip:123456789 at 127*0-)'.:/)&7'...0;user=phone>;tag=SD1sf9001--45026-530b969-77c7543f-530b969.
>>>>> and sent out..
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your help,
>>>>> /Tobias
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
>>>>> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
>>>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>>
>> -- 
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
>> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
>
> -- 
> Daniel-Constantin Mierla
> http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
> Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 28-30, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20161103/f31978b6/attachment.html>


More information about the sr-users mailing list