[SR-Users] Enum module and parallel branching

[Loic Chabert]

Hello guys,

After 3 days of tests, same result.
As describe in TM module, Q parameter ordering request transmission. When i
check Q value, each branch have a different value:

branch_route[MANAGE_BRANCH] {
        xlog("L_INFO", "new [$T_branch_idx]  $(branch(q)[$T_branch_idx]) to
$bf $ru\n");
}

May 16 14:45:02 kamailio-rt /usr/sbin/kamailio[22138]: INFO: <script>: new
[0]  980 to 0 sip:+33970720973 at vgw-master.local
May 16 14:45:02 kamailio-rt /usr/sbin/kamailio[22138]: INFO: <script>: new
[1]  970 to 0 sip:+33970720973 at vgw-backup.local
May 16 14:45:02 kamailio-rt /usr/sbin/kamailio[22138]: INFO: <script>: new
[2]  <null> to 0 sip:+33970720973 at vgw3.local

Q value follow DNS NAPTER response order.

Any ideas why my invite request has been sent at the same time, and not one
after another ? Special parameter needed in tm module ?

Regards.


2016-05-12 14:48 GMT+02:00 Loic Chabert <chabert.loic.74 at gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use enum module at core level to route my numbers to
> end-point asterisk servers.
> As i read (and validated by tests), when a phone number has two DNS NAPTER
> entries, enum module create two branch, one for each entries, and send
> request to asterisk servers (in the same time).
>
> Do you know any tricks or functions to disable parallel branching, and
> make serial branching instead (following responses returned by asterisk) ?
> I have also change preference and order in dns config file, same results.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Regards.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160516/d50f3a7a/attachment.html>