[SR-Users] UAC Register Asterisk

[Marrold]

Why not just relay the registration messages to Asterisk itself? What's the
use case?

Cheers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:34 AM, Alberto Sagredo <
alberto.sagredo at avanzada7.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Im trying to modify example for Asterisk/Kamailio integration that miconda
> did, and trying to handle Forwarded register to Asterisk in an
> authenticated way instead removing secret in asterisk.
>
> I have made this changes
>
>
> route[REGFWD] {
>
>         if(!is_method("REGISTER"))
>
>         {
>
>                 return;
>
>         }
>
>
>
>         $var(rip) = $var(astip);
>
>         $uac_req(method)="REGISTER";
>
>         $uac_req(ruri)="sip:" + $var(rip) + ":" + $var(astport);
>
>         $uac_req(furi)="sip:" + $(au{s.substr,8,0}) + "@" + $var(rip);
>
>         $uac_req(turi)="sip:" + $(au{s.substr,8,0}) + "@" + $var(rip);
>
>         $uac_req(hdrs)="Contact: <sip:" + $au + "@"
>
>                                 + $sel(cfg_get.kamailio.bindip)
>
>                                 + ":" + $sel(cfg_get.kamailio.bindport) +
> ">\r\n";
>
>         if($sel(contact.expires) != $null)
>
>                 $uac_req(hdrs)= $uac_req(hdrs) + "Expires: " +
> $sel(contact.expires) + "\r\n";
>
>         else
>
>                 $uac_req(hdrs)= $uac_req(hdrs) + "Expires: " +
> $hdr(Expires) + "\r\n";
>
>
>         xlog("Dentro de REGFWD");
>
>
>         t_on_failure("REG_AST");
>
>
>         uac_req_send();
>
>
> }
>
>
>
>
>  failure_route[REG_AST] {
>
>
>     if (t_is_canceled()) {
>
>         exit;
>
>     }
>
>
>     xlog("Dentro de REG AST");
>
>
>     if(t_check_status("401|407")) {
>
>         xlog("Dentro de 401");
>
>         $avp(auser) = "test";
>
>         $avp(apass) = "test";
>
>         uac_auth();
>
>         t_relay();
>
>         exit;
>
>     }
>
> }
>
>
> What i see  on traces:
>
>
> U x.x.x..240:5060 -> x.x.x..56:5060
>
> REGISTER sip:x.x.x.56:5060 SIP/2.0.
>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> x.x.x.240;branch=z9hG4bKfb46.a47535d4000000000000000000000000.0.
>
> To: <sip:200 at x.x.x.56>.
>
> From: <sip:200 at x.x.x.56>;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-6a4f.
>
> CSeq: 10 REGISTER.
>
> Call-ID: 09dc120d65932ed7-16044 at 127.0.0.1.
>
> Max-Forwards: 70.
>
> Content-Length: 0.
>
> User-Agent: ANY.
>
> Contact: <sip:emp_001_200 at x.x.x.240:5060>.
>
> Expires: 3600.
>
> .
>
>
> #
>
> U x.x.x.56:5060 -> x.x.x..240:5060
>
> SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized.
>
> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP x.x.x..240
> ;branch=z9hG4bKfb46.a47535d4000000000000000000000000.0;received=x.x.x..240
> ;rport=5060.
>
> From: <sip:200 at x.x.x.56>;tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-6a4f.
>
> To: <sip:200 at x.x.x.56>;tag=as62b47138.
>
> Call-ID: 09dc120d65932ed7-16044 at 127.0.0.1.
>
> CSeq: 10 REGISTER.
>
> Server: FPBX-2.11.0(11.17.1).
>
> Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO,
> PUBLISH, MESSAGE.
>
> Supported: replaces, timer.
>
> WWW-Authenticate: Digest algorithm=MD5, realm="asterisk", nonce="59e39692".
>
> Content-Length: 0.
>
> .
>
>
> But Kamailio is not sending authentication .
>
> Any idea what could be wrong? Or any tip to do what i try.
>
> The idea is that a sip endpoint register with authentication on kamailio
> and it sends register with authentication to asterisk.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160331/a0ec6157/attachment.html>