[SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
Jonathan Hunter
hunterj91 at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 15 11:26:27 CET 2016
Perfect, thanks Daniel, all works!
Sorry for the noise :)
Jon
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
To: hunterj91 at hotmail.com; sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
From: miconda at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 08:48:31 +0100
Hello,
On 14/03/16 17:39, Jonathan Hunter
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Actually I see I need to go to 4.3 to use the
ds_default_socket parameter.
... and per destination by using socket param in attributes:
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatcher.ex.attributes
Cheers,
Daniel
Will go to 4.3 and see how it goes.
Thanks
Jon
modparam("dispatcher", "ds_default_socket", "udp:192.168.0.125:5060")
From: hunterj91 at hotmail.com
To: miconda at gmail.com; sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 15:59:51 +0000
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple
VIPs defined
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply, sorry I keep missing you ! :)
I have added force_send_socket in the correct places
now , and I can now make inbound/outbound calls are
required.
However with dispatcher, when Im trying to send SIP
options pings to gateways defined, I see these errors;
RROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2564]:
ds_check_timer(): unable to ping [sip:10.70.0.72:5080]
Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: <core>
[forward.c:218]: get_out_socket(): no socket found
Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: <core>
[forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding
socket found for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080)
Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:345]:
uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for
"10.70.0.72" af 2 (udp:10.70.0.72:5080)
Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: tm [uac.c:307]:
t_uac_prepare(): t_uac: no socket found
However this is only when the listening socket is the
VIP, if I define the true private local address to
listen on, dispatcher works nicely.
Can you set force socket for dispatcher module when
using probing?
Thanks
Jon
Subject: Re: [SR-Users]
Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
To: hunterj91 at hotmail.com;
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
From: miconda at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:55:52 +0100
Hello,
oh, forgot to follow up, as I read your response at
some point.
Are you doing force_send_socket() or $fs = ...? If
yes, what is the socket value you are forcing?
The log message said:
Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]:
ERROR: <core> [forward.c:220]:
get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found
for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080)
The socket listen in the rpc command output is
udp:10.70.0.75:5060.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/03/16 11:29,
Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Did you have any thoughts on this or is it
more ip routing related or ucarp configuration
on the server itself?
Looks like kamailio has it as a listening
socket.
Thanks
Jon
From: hunterj91 at hotmail.com
To: miconda at gmail.com;
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:31:29 +0000
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP
with Multiple VIPs defined
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply. Yes its
listed, however I see mhomed set to no?
however I have defined as on.
socket: {
proto: udp
address: 10.70.0.75
ipaddress:
10.70.0.75
proto: 5060
mcast: no
mhomed: no
}
ERROR: tm [ut.h:345]: uri2dst2():
no corresponding socket found for
"10.70.0.73" af 2
(udp:10.70.0.73:5080)
Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: tm
[t_fwd.c:522]: prepare_new_uac():
ERROR: can't fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no
corresponding listening socket)
Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: tm
[t_fwd.c:1779]: t_forward_nonack():
ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to
add branches
Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: sl
[sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error():
ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm
terribly sorry, server error occurred
(1/SL)
Am I missing something?
Thanks
Jon
To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
From: miconda at gmail.com
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:10:32 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and
UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
Hello,
can you see if the socket lists
includes the IP address giving
problems? Use the command:
kamcmd core.sockets_list
Cheers,
Daniel
On
02/03/16 10:14, Jonathan Hunter
wrote:
Hi Guys,
Using Centos 6.7, kamailio
4.2 and Ucarp I am testing
multiple VIPs on the same server
and having some issues.
I have ucarp running, with 1
Public and 1 Private VIP
defined, and both are pingable
and failover in a cluster.
The Public is for Subscribers
to Register with, and the
Private for Communication to the
Asterisk media servers behind
it.
My problem is kamailio when
started states its listening on
both the VIPS, however when I
try and force_socket over the
Private IP address, it states
ERROR: <core>
[forward.c:218]:
get_out_socket(): no socket
found
Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]:
ERROR: <core>
[forward.c:220]:
get_out_socket(): no
corresponding socket found
for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080)
Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]:
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:520]:
prepare_new_uac(): ERROR: can't
fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no
corresponding listening socket)
This is when listening on the
VIP which is 10.70.0.75 and I
also look to force_socket out of
this IP. It just doesnt work,
however if I use the physical
interface on the server, that
being 10.70.0.70, it works fine
and forwards requests on the
Private LAN.
I have added
net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind = 1 to
sysctl.conf as well but no joy.
If 1 VIP is defined I have no
issue, its just with 2, has
anyone had this issue before ?
Any help would be great.
Many thanks
Jon
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, March 7-9, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio
(OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160315/f2518538/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list