[SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
Jonathan Hunter
hunterj91 at hotmail.com
Mon Mar 14 16:59:51 CET 2016
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply, sorry I keep missing you ! :)
I have added force_send_socket in the correct places now , and I can now make inbound/outbound calls are required.
However with dispatcher, when Im trying to send SIP options pings to gateways defined, I see these errors;
RROR: dispatcher [dispatch.c:2564]: ds_check_timer(): unable to ping [sip:10.70.0.72:5080]Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:218]: get_out_socket(): no socket foundMar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: <core> [forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding socket found for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080)Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:345]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "10.70.0.72" af 2 (udp:10.70.0.72:5080)Mar 14 15:56:25 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[26708]: ERROR: tm [uac.c:307]: t_uac_prepare(): t_uac: no socket found
However this is only when the listening socket is the VIP, if I define the true private local address to listen on, dispatcher works nicely.
Can you set force socket for dispatcher module when using probing?
Thanks
Jon
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
To: hunterj91 at hotmail.com; sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
From: miconda at gmail.com
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 16:55:52 +0100
Hello,
oh, forgot to follow up, as I read your response at some point.
Are you doing force_send_socket() or $fs = ...? If yes, what is the
socket value you are forcing?
The log message said:
Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]: ERROR:
<core> [forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no corresponding
socket found for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080)
The socket listen in the rpc command output is udp:10.70.0.75:5060.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 08/03/16 11:29, Jonathan Hunter
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Did you have any thoughts on this or is it more ip routing
related or ucarp configuration on the server itself?
Looks like kamailio has it as a listening socket.
Thanks
Jon
From: hunterj91 at hotmail.com
To: miconda at gmail.com; sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:31:29 +0000
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple
VIPs defined
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply. Yes its listed, however I see
mhomed set to no? however I have defined as on.
socket: {
proto: udp
address: 10.70.0.75
ipaddress: 10.70.0.75
proto: 5060
mcast: no
mhomed: no
}
ERROR: tm [ut.h:345]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding
socket found for "10.70.0.73" af 2
(udp:10.70.0.73:5080)
Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]:
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:522]: prepare_new_uac(): ERROR:
can't fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no corresponding
listening socket)
Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]:
ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1779]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR:
t_forward_nonack: failure to add branches
Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]:
ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR:
sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error
occurred (1/SL)
Am I missing something?
Thanks
Jon
To:
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
From: miconda at gmail.com
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:10:32 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with
Multiple VIPs defined
Hello,
can you see if the socket lists includes the IP
address giving problems? Use the command:
kamcmd core.sockets_list
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02/03/16 10:14,
Jonathan Hunter wrote:
Hi Guys,
Using Centos 6.7, kamailio 4.2 and Ucarp I am
testing multiple VIPs on the same server and
having some issues.
I have ucarp running, with 1 Public and 1
Private VIP defined, and both are pingable and
failover in a cluster.
The Public is for Subscribers to Register
with, and the Private for Communication to the
Asterisk media servers behind it.
My problem is kamailio when started states
its listening on both the VIPS, however when I
try and force_socket over the Private IP
address, it states
ERROR: <core> [forward.c:218]:
get_out_socket(): no socket found
Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]: ERROR: <core>
[forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no
corresponding socket found
for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080)
Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1
/usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]: ERROR: tm
[t_fwd.c:520]: prepare_new_uac(): ERROR: can't
fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no corresponding
listening socket)
This is when listening on the VIP which is
10.70.0.75 and I also look to force_socket out
of this IP. It just doesnt work, however if I
use the physical interface on the server, that
being 10.70.0.70, it works fine and forwards
requests on the Private LAN.
I have added net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind = 1 to
sysctl.conf as well but no joy.
If 1 VIP is defined I have no issue, its just
with 2, has anyone had this issue before ?
Any help would be great.
Many thanks
Jon
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, March 7-9, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users
mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160314/4591076e/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list