[SR-Users] TCP connection select problem

[Daniel-Constantin Mierla]

Are you using Path with received parameter on KA Edge?

Are bot Linphone behind the same NAT router?

Cheers,
Daniel

On 08/03/16 08:08, 张顺通 wrote:
> my program structure is 
>
> LinPhone------TCP------KA_EDGE------UDP------KA_REGISTER------UDP------FS
>
> KA_EDGE:all clients TCP connection is in this server
> KS_REGSITER:all register info is process here
>
> when User A want to use program,Linphone send SIP REGISTER to KA_EDGE
> by TCP(and  TCP is always present), and KA_EDGE send to KA_REGISTER by
> UDP.
>
> when  FS want to Call A, FS generate SIP:
> INVITE A at KA_REGISTER_IP
>
> KA_REGISTER recive INVITE, lookup the register list, send to KA_EDGE
> INVITE TCP_IP:TCP_PORT
> Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
>
> and LinPhone recive that INVITE.
>
>
> *my question is:*
>
> LinPhone A and LinPhone B both register in KA_REGISTER.
> FS send INVITE:
> INVITE B: KA_REGISTER_IP
> and KA_REGISTER lookup correct，send to KA_EDGE
> INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
> Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
>
> but KA_EDGE is not correct.sip is correct,*but KA_EDGE send the INVITE
> to A' TCP connnection*
> INVITE TCP_IP_B:TCP_PORT_B
> Route:KA_EDGE_IP:KA_EDGE_PORT
>
>
> Someone had this problem?Is this a bug?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
> sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, Berlin, May 18-20, 2016 - http://www.kamailioworld.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160309/c9e823b0/attachment.html>