[SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
Jonathan Hunter
hunterj91 at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 8 11:29:46 CET 2016
Hi Daniel,
Did you have any thoughts on this or is it more ip routing related or ucarp configuration on the server itself?
Looks like kamailio has it as a listening socket.
Thanks
Jon
From: hunterj91 at hotmail.com
To: miconda at gmail.com; sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2016 12:31:29 +0000
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply. Yes its listed, however I see mhomed set to no? however I have defined as on.
socket: { proto: udp address: 10.70.0.75 ipaddress: 10.70.0.75 proto: 5060 mcast: no mhomed: no }
ERROR: tm [ut.h:345]: uri2dst2(): no corresponding socket found for "10.70.0.73" af 2 (udp:10.70.0.73:5080)Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:522]: prepare_new_uac(): ERROR: can't fwd to af 2, proto 1 (no corresponding listening socket)Mar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1779]: t_forward_nonack(): ERROR: t_forward_nonack: failure to add branchesMar 4 12:28:43 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[7264]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:387]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL)
Am I missing something?
Thanks
Jon
To: sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
From: miconda at gmail.com
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 12:10:32 +0100
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio and UCARP with Multiple VIPs defined
Hello,
can you see if the socket lists includes the IP address giving
problems? Use the command:
kamcmd core.sockets_list
Cheers,
Daniel
On 02/03/16 10:14, Jonathan Hunter
wrote:
Hi Guys,
Using Centos 6.7, kamailio 4.2 and Ucarp I am testing
multiple VIPs on the same server and having some issues.
I have ucarp running, with 1 Public and 1 Private VIP
defined, and both are pingable and failover in a cluster.
The Public is for Subscribers to Register with, and the
Private for Communication to the Asterisk media servers behind
it.
My problem is kamailio when started states its listening on
both the VIPS, however when I try and force_socket over the
Private IP address, it states
ERROR: <core> [forward.c:218]: get_out_socket(): no
socket found
Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]: ERROR:
<core> [forward.c:220]: get_out_socket(): no
corresponding socket found for(udp:10.70.0.72:5080)
Mar 1 20:04:35 bt1proxy1 /usr/sbin/kamailio[20372]: ERROR:
tm [t_fwd.c:520]: prepare_new_uac(): ERROR: can't fwd to af 2,
proto 1 (no corresponding listening socket)
This is when listening on the VIP which is 10.70.0.75 and I
also look to force_socket out of this IP. It just doesnt
work, however if I use the physical interface on the server,
that being 10.70.0.70, it works fine and forwards requests on
the Private LAN.
I have added net.ipv4.ip_nonlocal_bind = 1 to sysctl.conf
as well but no joy.
If 1 VIP is defined I have no issue, its just with 2, has
anyone had this issue before ?
Any help would be great.
Many thanks
Jon
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, March 7-9, 2016 - http://www.asipto.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users at lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160308/293cec10/attachment.html>
More information about the sr-users
mailing list