[SR-Users] Kamailio consult CNAM server through SIP Subscribe.

[José Seabra]

Hi Daniel,
I have applied your last two patchs on tm module but i can't compile the
module because kemi framwork.

I'm using kamailio version 4.4.

Compile Errors:

t_fwd.c:61:24: error: ../../kemi.h: No such file or directory
t_fwd.c: In function ‘prepare_new_uac’:
t_fwd.c:157: error: ‘sr_kemi_eng_t’ undeclared (first use in this function)
t_fwd.c:157: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
t_fwd.c:157: error: for each function it appears in.)
t_fwd.c:157: error: ‘keng’ undeclared (first use in this function)
t_fwd.c:346: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘sr_kemi_eng_get’
t_fwd.c:348: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘sr_kemi_act_ctx_get’
t_fwd.c:348: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
t_fwd.c:350: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘sr_kemi_act_ctx_set’
t_fwd.c:352: warning: implicit declaration of function
‘sr_kemi_cbname_lookup_idx’
t_fwd.c: In function ‘add_blind_uac’:
t_fwd.c:715: error: ‘TM_UAC_FLAG_BLIND’ undeclared (first use in this
function)
make: *** [t_fwd.o] Error 1

Regards
José


2016-06-21 9:38 GMT+01:00 José Seabra <joseseabra4 at gmail.com>:

> Hello Daniel,
>
> I confirm that the phone receives 200 OK to the CANCEL and  487 to the
> INVITE.
>
> I will backport the tm module to the last two patchs, then, after make all
> tests I will report back to you.
>
> Regards
> José
>
> 2016-06-21 5:33 GMT+01:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda at gmail.com>:
>
>> Can you try with master branch or backport the last two patches from tm
>> module? I pushed two commits that should catch and handle better this case.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 20/06/16 18:14, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> it seems it tries to generate an outgoing cancel for the suspended
>> branch. I will check the code, likely there has to be added condition for
>> this cases.
>>
>> Is the 487 reply for invite sent back? Also, the 200ok for cancel?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Daniel
>>
>> On 20/06/16 16:38, José Seabra wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm attaching more logs to this email regarding to the issue on  SIP
>> CANCEL  to an INVITE that is suspended.
>>
>> If do you think that i should open an issue on git regarding to this let
>> me know.
>>
>> Thank you for your help.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> José
>>
>> 2016-06-15 14:42 GMT+01:00 José Seabra <joseseabra4 at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>>
>>> But when Kamailio receives a CANCEL prints the following error messages:
>>>
>>> 2016-06-15 14:39:10.354  ERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:287]:
>>> build_local_reparse(): ERROR: build_local_reparse: INVITE is missing
>>> 2016-06-15 14:39:10.354  ERROR: tm [t_msgbuilder.c:494]:
>>> build_local_reparse(): ERROR: build_local_reparse: cannot build CANCEL
>>> request
>>> 2016-06-15 14:39:10.354  ERROR: tm [t_cancel.c:310]: cancel_branch():
>>> ERROR: attempt to build a CANCEL failed
>>> 2016-06-15 14:39:10.354  ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1389]: e2e_cancel(): ERROR:
>>> cancel error
>>>
>>> I'm handling the CANCEL in the script by the following way:
>>>
>>>
>>>  if (is_method("CANCEL")) {
>>>                 if (t_check_trans()) {
>>>                         route(RELAY);
>>>                 } else {
>>>                         sl_send_reply("481", "Call leg/transaction does
>>> not exist");
>>>                 }
>>>                 exit();
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Thank you for your support.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> José
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-06-15 12:15 GMT+01:00 Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
>>> <miconda at gmail.com>miconda at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> On 14/06/16 16:33, José Seabra wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Olle and Daniel,
>>>> Thank you for your replies, After receive your msg I looked again to my
>>>> script and i found the problem.
>>>>
>>>> I didn't configure the correct failure_route block and the failure
>>>> route configured didn't print any msg on the logs, so I thought that
>>>> it wasn't entering on failure route.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for my mistake.
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, How should i handle the CANCEL sip msg to an INVITE that is
>>>> suspended? (still related with this implementation)
>>>>
>>>> Just handling it as done in the default configuration file is ok -- the
>>>> suspended transaction will be canceled.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Daniel-Constantin Mierlahttp://www.asipto.com - http://www.kamailio.orghttp://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cumprimentos
> José Seabra
>



-- 
Cumprimentos
José Seabra
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sip-router.org/pipermail/sr-users/attachments/20160621/92c78d87/attachment.html>